• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过内在动静脉分流挽救的再植头皮的二期扩张。

Secondary expansion of a replanted scalp salvaged by an intrinsic arteriovenous shunt.

作者信息

Hallock G G

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, PA 18103, USA.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Jun;103(7):1957-60. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199906000-00021.

DOI:10.1097/00006534-199906000-00021
PMID:10359258
Abstract
  1. Although scalping injuries reported in most large series rarely involve young children, partial scalp replantation, even in a 2-year-old boy after a dog-bite avulsion, should also be warranted. However, technical difficulties because of the diminutive vasculature can be expected. 2. Unconventional methods for reestablishing inflow or outflow for the replanted scalp may become the only practical alternative and must not be overlooked. In this case, an arteriovenous shunt between the frontal branch of the superficial temporal artery within the amputated part itself to a more distal scalp vein at the superior edge of the fragment allowed high-output flow to maintain patency after recurrent thromboses of the conventional superficial temporal arterial anastomosis. This fistula was assumed to be the major contributor to nutrient flow of the remaining scalp, as the parietal branch was truncated along the margin of the avulsion. 3. Delayed tissue expansion is also an option. In this case, delayed expansion of the replanted scalp that survived allowed elimination of the skin grafts needed to cover areas where necrosis ensued, restoration of the anterior hairline, and resulted in a more normal appearance.
摘要
  1. 尽管在大多数大型病例系列中报道的头皮撕脱伤很少涉及幼儿,但即使是一名2岁男孩被狗咬伤致头皮撕脱后进行部分头皮再植也是合理的。然而,可以预料到由于血管细小会存在技术困难。2. 为再植头皮重建流入或流出的非常规方法可能成为唯一可行的选择,绝不能被忽视。在这种情况下,在断离部分内的颞浅动脉额支与碎片上缘更远处的头皮静脉之间建立动静脉分流,使得在传统的颞浅动脉吻合口反复血栓形成后仍能维持高输出血流通畅。由于顶支在撕脱边缘处被截断,该瘘管被认为是剩余头皮营养血流的主要来源。3. 延迟组织扩张也是一种选择。在这种情况下,对存活的再植头皮进行延迟扩张,能够消除覆盖坏死区域所需的皮肤移植,恢复前额发际线,并使外观更接近正常。

相似文献

1
Secondary expansion of a replanted scalp salvaged by an intrinsic arteriovenous shunt.通过内在动静脉分流挽救的再植头皮的二期扩张。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Jun;103(7):1957-60. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199906000-00021.
2
Replantation of total avulsed scalp with microsurgery: experience of eight cases and literature review.显微外科技术行全头皮撕脱再植术:8例经验及文献复习
J Trauma. 2008 Mar;64(3):796-802. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180341fdb.
3
Reconstruction of Pediatric Scalp Avulsion Injuries After Dog Bites.儿童犬咬伤后头皮撕脱伤的重建
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jul;28(5):1282-1285. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003607.
4
Scalp replantation by arterialised venous network flow-through.通过动脉化静脉网络血流再植头皮。
Br J Plast Surg. 1992 Apr;45(3):187-92. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(92)90074-8.
5
Microsurgical Replantation of Total Avulsed Scalp: Extending the Limits.全头皮撕脱伤的显微外科再植:拓展极限
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 May;28(3):670-674. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003487.
6
Microsurgical replantation of partial avulsion of the scalp. Case report.头皮部分撕脱伤的显微外科再植。病例报告。
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1995 Jun;29(2):177-80. doi: 10.3109/02844319509034335.
7
Secondary expansion of a totally replanted scalp for aesthetic adjustment.完全再植头皮的二次扩张用于美学调整。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Dec;94(7):1052-4. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199412000-00021.
8
Replantation and triple expansion of a three-piece total scalp avulsion: six-year follow-up.三件式全头皮撕脱伤的再植与三重扩张:六年随访
Ann Plast Surg. 2001 Feb;46(2):167-9. doi: 10.1097/00000637-200102000-00015.
9
Total scalp replantation salvaged by changing the recipient vein.通过更换受区静脉挽救全头皮再植术
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Sep;23(5):1428-9. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31825e3a94.
10
Replantation of avulsed scalps and secondary aesthetic correction.撕脱头皮再植及二期美学修复。
Ann Plast Surg. 2000 Apr;44(4):361-6. doi: 10.1097/00000637-200044040-00002.