Arozullah A M, Ferreira M R, Bennett R L, Gilman S, Henderson W G, Daley J, Khuri S, Bennett C L
Brockton/West Roxbury VA Medical Center, West Roxbury, MA, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Jun;188(6):604-22. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00047-2.
While studies have found racial differences in the rates of use of established invasive cardiac and cerebrovascular procedures, no study has evaluated racial variation in the rates of adoption of new surgical procedures. For patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the procedure represents a new and safe option that shortens the duration of postoperative hospitalization by almost one week. In this study, we evaluated whether, in the equal access Veterans Affairs (VA) medical system, the rate of adoption of this procedure and improvements in the duration of postoperative hospitalization differed between African-American and Caucasian patients.
Data were obtained from two sources-administrative claims files and prospectively compiled dinical data from medical records and patient interviews. In both data sets, frequency of use, length of stay, and outcomes for African-American and Caucasian patients undergoing minimally invasive and open gallbladder surgery were analyzed for the first four years of use of the procedure in the VA system (1992 to 1995).
Analyses based on claims files indicated that, after adjustment for potentially confounding variables, African-American patients who underwent cholecystectomy in VA medical centers were 25% less likely to undergo a minimally invasive cholecystectomy during the first 4 years of use of the new procedure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.83). Shortening of the average postoperative length of stay from 9 days or more in the prelaparoscopic era to less than 4.5 days for patients undergoing the laparoscopic procedure occurred in the first year for Caucasian patients, but did not occur until the fourth year for African-American patients (p<0.001). The overall difference in postoperative length of stay between African-American and Caucasian patients more than doubled from 1.7 days before introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to 3.8 days in the fourth year. In comparison, analyses based on nurse-compiled clinical data indicated that, after adjustment for relevant clinical factors, racial variations in the rate of laparoscopic surgery were even larger (adjusted odds ratio for laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for African-American versus Caucasian veterans, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.84).
Compared to Caucasian patients, African-American patients who underwent cholecystectomy in VA medical centers had an approximately 25% to 32% lower likelihood of undergoing minimally invasive cholecystectomy procedures. The differences in rates of adoption of laparoscopic surgery did not appear to be from more comorbid illnesses among African-American patients. African-American and Caucasian veterans may differ in their preference for new surgical procedures like laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Conversely, VA physicians may have been less likely to recommend laparoscopic cholecystectomies to African-American patients.
虽然研究发现,在已有的侵入性心脏和脑血管手术的使用比率上存在种族差异,但尚无研究评估新手术采用率方面的种族差异。对于接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者而言,该手术是一种新的安全选择,可使术后住院时间缩短近一周。在本研究中,我们评估了在平等就医的退伍军人事务(VA)医疗系统中,非裔美国患者和白人患者在该手术的采用率以及术后住院时间的改善方面是否存在差异。
数据来自两个来源——行政索赔文件以及从病历和患者访谈中前瞻性收集的临床数据。在这两个数据集中,对VA系统中该手术使用的前四年(1992年至1995年)接受微创和开放胆囊手术的非裔美国患者和白人患者的使用频率、住院时间和结果进行了分析。
基于索赔文件的分析表明,在对潜在的混杂变量进行调整后,在VA医疗中心接受胆囊切除术的非裔美国患者在新手术使用的前四年中接受微创胆囊切除术的可能性要低25%(调整后的优势比为0.74;95%置信区间为0.66 - 0.83)。对于接受腹腔镜手术的患者,白人患者在第一年就实现了平均术后住院时间从腹腔镜手术前时代的9天或更长缩短至不到4.5天,而非裔美国患者直到第四年才实现这一缩短(p < 0.001)。非裔美国患者和白人患者术后住院时间的总体差异从腹腔镜胆囊切除术引入前的1.7天增加了一倍多,在第四年达到3.8天。相比之下,基于护士收集的临床数据的分析表明,在对相关临床因素进行调整后,腹腔镜手术率的种族差异甚至更大(非裔美国退伍军人与白人退伍军人进行腹腔镜与开放胆囊切除术的调整后优势比为0.68;95%置信区间为0.55 - 0.84)。
与白人患者相比,在VA医疗中心接受胆囊切除术的非裔美国患者接受微创胆囊切除术的可能性要低约25%至32%。腹腔镜手术采用率的差异似乎并非源于非裔美国患者中更多的合并症。非裔美国退伍军人和白人退伍军人在对腹腔镜胆囊切除术等新手术的偏好上可能存在差异。相反,VA医生可能不太可能向非裔美国患者推荐腹腔镜胆囊切除术。