Suppr超能文献

对β2受体激动剂支气管保护作用的耐受性:沙丁胺醇对映体与消旋沙丁胺醇和安慰剂的比较。

Tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of beta2-agonists: comparison of the enantiomers of salbutamol with racemic salbutamol and placebo.

作者信息

Cockcroft D W, Davis B E, Swystun V A, Marciniuk D D

机构信息

Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W8, Canada.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Jun;103(6):1049-53. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70178-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regular use of racemic salbutamol results in the partial loss of its bronchoprotective effect. The 2 enantiomers of salbutamol, the bronchodilator R-salbutamol and nonbronchodilator S-salbutamol, are now available.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the effect of regular use of S-salbutamol, R-salbutamol, racemic salbutamol, and placebo on the bronchoprotective effect of a single dose of racemic salbutamol against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction.

METHODS

Eleven of 13 well-controlled beta2 -agonist-free asthmatic subjects completed a double-blind, randomized study comparing racemic salbutamol 2.5 mg, S-salbutamol 1. 25 mg, R-salbutamol 1.25 mg, and diluent placebo nebulized and inhaled 3 times daily for 6 days (>/=6-day washout period). Ten to 12 hours after the last dose, the subjects performed measurement of FEV1, methacholine PC20, and a repeat methacholine PC20 done 1 hour after the first methacholine test and 10 minutes after 2 puffs (200 microgram) of racemic salbutamol administered from a metered-dose inhaler. The primary endpoint was the methacholine PC20 dose shift (Deltalog PC20/log 2) from before to after administration of 200 microgram of racemic salbutamol.

RESULTS

The methacholine dose shift was 3.2 doubling doses (9-fold increase in methacholine PC20 after 200 microgram of racemic salbutamol) during the placebo treatment and was unaltered (3.2) after administration of S-salbutamol. The dose shift was significantly lower after both the R-salbutamol and racemic salbutamol treatments (2.2 and 2.6 doubling doses, respectively); there was no significant difference between R-salbutamol and racemic salbutamol. There was no treatment effect on baseline FEV1, baseline methacholine PC20, or bronchodilation.

CONCLUSION

Regular treatment with racemic salbutamol or R-salbutamol, but not S-salbutamol, results in a partial loss of bronchoprotection, without loss of bronchodilation, compared with placebo.

摘要

背景

长期使用消旋沙丁胺醇会导致其支气管保护作用部分丧失。目前已有沙丁胺醇的两种对映体,即支气管扩张剂R - 沙丁胺醇和非支气管扩张剂S - 沙丁胺醇。

目的

我们旨在比较长期使用S - 沙丁胺醇、R - 沙丁胺醇、消旋沙丁胺醇和安慰剂对单剂量消旋沙丁胺醇预防乙酰甲胆碱诱导的支气管收缩的支气管保护作用的影响。

方法

13名病情控制良好且未使用β2激动剂的哮喘患者中有11名完成了一项双盲随机研究,比较了2.5毫克消旋沙丁胺醇、1.25毫克S - 沙丁胺醇、1.25毫克R - 沙丁胺醇和稀释剂安慰剂,每日雾化吸入3次,共6天(洗脱期≥6天)。在最后一剂给药10至12小时后,受试者进行第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、乙酰甲胆碱PC20的测量,并在首次乙酰甲胆碱试验后1小时以及从定量吸入器吸入2喷(200微克)消旋沙丁胺醇10分钟后重复测量乙酰甲胆碱PC20。主要终点是在给予200微克消旋沙丁胺醇前后乙酰甲胆碱PC20剂量的变化(Δlog PC20/log 2)。

结果

在安慰剂治疗期间,乙酰甲胆碱剂量变化为3.2倍剂量(给予200微克消旋沙丁胺醇后乙酰甲胆碱PC20增加9倍),给予S - 沙丁胺醇后未改变(3.2)。R - 沙丁胺醇和消旋沙丁胺醇治疗后剂量变化均显著降低(分别为2.2和2.6倍剂量);R - 沙丁胺醇和消旋沙丁胺醇之间无显著差异。对基线FEV1、基线乙酰甲胆碱PC20或支气管扩张无治疗效果。

结论

与安慰剂相比,长期使用消旋沙丁胺醇或R - 沙丁胺醇会导致支气管保护作用部分丧失,但不会丧失支气管扩张作用,而长期使用S - 沙丁胺醇则不会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验