Kelly H William
Department of Pediatrics, Pediatrics/Pulmonary, MSC10-5590, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2007 Jul;7(4):310-4. doi: 10.1007/s11882-007-0046-7.
The purpose of this review is to determine whether the proinflammatory actions identified in vitro for (S)-albuterol provide a clinically significant therapeutic advantage for levalbuterol over racemic albuterol. Clinical trials evaluating the bronchodilation in chronic and acute asthma provide conflicting evidence. Older trials suggested an advantage for levalbuterol; however, the newer trials have failed to confirm those advantages. Although (S)-albuterol produces increased bronchial hyperresponsiveness in vitro and in animal models, this has not been consistently confirmed in clinical trials; however, the heterogeneity of the trials precludes definitive conclusions. Current clinical trials do not provide evidence of a substantial advantage of levalbuterol over racemic albuterol although the data are insufficient to determine whether subsets of the patient population might benefit from single isomer therapy.
本综述的目的是确定体外鉴定出的(S)-沙丁胺醇的促炎作用是否能为左旋沙丁胺醇提供相对于消旋沙丁胺醇具有临床意义的治疗优势。评估慢性和急性哮喘中支气管扩张作用的临床试验提供了相互矛盾的证据。早期试验表明左旋沙丁胺醇具有优势;然而,较新的试验未能证实这些优势。尽管(S)-沙丁胺醇在体外和动物模型中会导致支气管高反应性增加,但这在临床试验中并未得到一致证实;然而,试验的异质性使得无法得出明确结论。目前的临床试验并未提供证据表明左旋沙丁胺醇相对于消旋沙丁胺醇具有实质性优势,尽管现有数据不足以确定患者群体中的某些亚组是否可能从单一异构体治疗中获益。