Winkelaar G B, Chen J C, Salvian A J, Taylor D C, Teal P A, Hsiang Y N
Division of Vascular Surgery, Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
J Vasc Surg. 1999 Jun;29(6):986-94. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70239-9.
The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) showed that selected patients benefited from surgery when their carotid artery was 50% or more stenosed. This study assessed the accuracy of color-flow duplex ultrasound scanning (DUS) parameters to detect 50% or greater carotid artery stenosis and to determine the situations in which carotid endarterectomy (CEA) without angiography could be justified.
From March 1, 1995, to December 1, 1995, all patients considered for CEA were studied with DUS and carotid angiography. Results of the two tests were blindly compared. DUS measurements of internal carotid artery (ICA) peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity, and ratio of the ICA to common carotid artery PSV (ICA/CCA) were subjected to receiver operator characteristic curve analysis to determine the most accurate criterion predicting 50% or greater angiographic stenosis. The criterion for identifying patients for CEA without angiography was selected from criteria with a high positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity.
A total of 188 carotid bifurcations were available for comparison. A PSV (ICA/CCA) of 2 or higher was the most accurate criterion for detection of 50% or greater stenosis, with an accuracy rate of 93% (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 89%; PPV, 92%). A PSV (ICA/CCA) of 3.6 or higher was the best criterion for identifying candidates for CEA who had not undergone earlier angiography, with PPV, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of 98%, 77%, 98%, and 86%, respectively.
These redefined criteria detect the NASCET-defined threshold level of 50% or greater ICA stenosis, above which CEA results in stroke reduction. A management algorithm based on these criteria should help to minimize both angiography and unnecessary intervention.
北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验(NASCET)表明,特定患者在其颈动脉狭窄50%或更严重时可从手术中获益。本研究评估了彩色血流双功超声扫描(DUS)参数检测50%或更严重颈动脉狭窄的准确性,并确定无需血管造影即可进行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的情况。
从1995年3月1日至1995年12月1日,所有考虑行CEA的患者均接受了DUS和颈动脉血管造影检查。对两项检查结果进行了盲法比较。对颈内动脉(ICA)的收缩期峰值流速(PSV)、舒张末期流速以及ICA与颈总动脉PSV之比(ICA/CCA)的DUS测量结果进行了受试者操作特征曲线分析,以确定预测血管造影狭窄50%或更严重的最准确标准。从具有高阳性预测值(PPV)和敏感性的标准中选择用于识别无需血管造影即可行CEA患者的标准。
共有188个颈动脉分叉可供比较。PSV(ICA/CCA)为2或更高是检测50%或更严重狭窄的最准确标准,准确率为93%(敏感性为96%;特异性为89%;PPV为92%)。PSV(ICA/CCA)为3.6或更高是识别未接受过早期血管造影的CEA候选者的最佳标准,其PPV、敏感性、特异性和准确率分别为98%、77%、98%和86%。
这些重新定义的标准可检测出NASCET定义的ICA狭窄50%或更严重的阈值水平,高于该水平CEA可降低卒中发生率。基于这些标准的管理算法应有助于尽量减少血管造影和不必要的干预。