Suppr超能文献

彩色双功超声与B-flow成像联合应用于颈动脉狭窄患者的评估

Combined use of color duplex ultrasonography and B-flow imaging for evaluation of patients with carotid artery stenosis.

作者信息

Tola Muharrem, Yurdakul Mehmet, Cumhur Turhan

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Hospital, Kizilay Sokak No: 4, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 Nov-Dec;25(10):1856-60.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Color duplex ultrasonography (CDU) is a standard method of noninvasive evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS). B-flow imaging (BFI), on the other hand, is a newer method. We investigated the accuracy of the two noninvasive tests--CDU and BFI--each separately and as a combination of the two tests by comparing with digital subtraction angiography as a reference standard.

METHODS

We performed CDU, BFI, and digital subtraction angiography on 95 consecutive patients with ICAS. Separate and combined test results of CDU and BFI were compared with digital subtraction angiography results.

RESULTS

For identifying 70% to 99% ICAS, as CDU criterion, the ratio of internal carotid artery to common carotid artery peak systolic velocity had the highest diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 96%). The sensitivity and specificity of BFI were 65% and 98%, respectively. With CDU and BFI, results were concordant in 144 (89%) cases for 70% to 99% ICAS. Sensitivity and specificity of combined CDU and BFI results for identification of ICAS were 95% and 99%, respectively. The misclassification rates of CDU and BFI were 4.7% and 8.1%, respectively. When combined test results were concordant, the misclassification rate decreased to 1.4%.

CONCLUSION

CDU showed a slightly better accuracy than did BFI in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. Combined use of CDU and BFI is more accurate than use of either test alone.

摘要

背景与目的

彩色双功超声(CDU)是无创评估颈内动脉狭窄(ICAS)的标准方法。另一方面,B型血流成像(BFI)是一种较新的方法。我们通过与数字减影血管造影作为参考标准进行比较,分别研究了两种无创检查——CDU和BFI——各自以及两者联合使用时的准确性。

方法

我们对95例连续性ICAS患者进行了CDU、BFI和数字减影血管造影检查。将CDU和BFI的单独及联合检查结果与数字减影血管造影结果进行比较。

结果

对于识别70%至99%的ICAS,作为CDU标准,颈内动脉与颈总动脉收缩期峰值速度之比具有最高的诊断准确性(敏感性为94%;特异性为96%)。BFI的敏感性和特异性分别为65%和98%。对于70%至99%的ICAS,CDU和BFI的结果在144例(89%)中一致。CDU和BFI联合结果识别ICAS的敏感性和特异性分别为95%和99%。CDU和BFI的错误分类率分别为4.7%和8.1%。当联合检查结果一致时,错误分类率降至1.4%。

结论

在诊断颈动脉狭窄方面,CDU的准确性略高于BFI。CDU和BFI联合使用比单独使用任何一种检查更准确。

相似文献

4
B-flow imaging for the measurement of residual lumen diameter of renal artery stenosis.
J Clin Ultrasound. 2012 Feb;40(2):85-90. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20892. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

4
B-Flow imaging of the placenta: A feasibility study.胎盘的B-Flow成像:一项可行性研究。
Ultrasound. 2018 Aug;26(3):160-167. doi: 10.1177/1742271X18768841. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
Thyroid B-flow twinkling sign: a new feature of papillary cancer.甲状腺B血流闪烁征:乳头状癌的一项新特征。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2008 Oct;159(4):447-51. doi: 10.1530/EJE-07-0891. Epub 2008 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

3
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid arteries: utility in routine clinical practice.
Stroke. 2002 Dec;33(12):2834-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000043632.51378.24.
9
B-mode flow imaging of the carotid artery.颈动脉B型血流成像
Stroke. 2001 Sep;32(9):2055-7. doi: 10.1161/hs0901.095648.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验