Kliethermes P A, Cross M L, Lanese M G, Johnson K M, Simon S D
Children's Mercy Hospital, Section of Neonatology, Kansas City, MO 64108-4698, USA.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1999 May-Jun;28(3):264-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1999.tb01991.x.
To compare nasogastric tube and bottle supplementation as two means of transitioning preterm infants to breastfeeding within an established breastfeeding support program.
Prospective, randomized controlled trial; mothers and health care providers, who were not blinded.
Metropolitan private regional perinatal center; 40-bed intensive-care nursery.
Eighty-four preterm breastfed infants whose birth weight was 1,000-2,500 g.
Rates of exclusive and partial breastfeeding at discharge from the intensive-care nursery, and at 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months after discharge.
Compared with infants receiving bottle supplements, infants receiving nasogastric tube supplements were more likely to be breastfeeding at discharge and at 3 days, 3 months and 6 months, after adjusting for confounding variables. Odds ratios (confidence intervals = 95%) showed that the group receiving nasogastric supplements was 4.5 times (1.4 to 15) more likely to be breastfed at discharge and 9.4 times more likely to be fully breastfed (3.1 to 28.4). There were significantly fewer apnea and bradycardia episodes in the group receiving nasogastric supplements, although they had more episodes that required stimulation for resolution. Groups were not different with respect to length of hospitalization and infant weight at discharge.
Using nasogastric tube supplementation during transition to oral feedings increases the likelihood of breastfeeding at discharge, 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months. This intervention requires a program with skilled personnel and an environment that allows the mother and infant to be in close physical proximity. Further study should investigate differences in the effects on maternal confidence, imprinting, and suck mechanism when preterm infants are bottle fed and breastfed.
在既定的母乳喂养支持项目中,比较鼻胃管补充喂养和奶瓶补充喂养这两种方式在帮助早产儿过渡到母乳喂养方面的效果。
前瞻性随机对照试验;母亲和医护人员未设盲。
大都市私立地区围产期中心;拥有40张床位的重症监护病房。
84名出生体重为1000 - 2500克的早产母乳喂养婴儿。
重症监护病房出院时、出院后3天、3个月和6个月时的纯母乳喂养率和部分母乳喂养率。
在调整混杂变量后,与接受奶瓶补充喂养的婴儿相比,接受鼻胃管补充喂养的婴儿在出院时以及出院后3天、3个月和6个月时进行母乳喂养的可能性更大。优势比(95%置信区间)显示,接受鼻胃管补充喂养的组在出院时进行母乳喂养的可能性是另一组的4.5倍(1.4至15),完全母乳喂养的可能性是另一组的9.4倍(3.1至28.4)。接受鼻胃管补充喂养的组呼吸暂停和心动过缓发作次数明显较少,尽管他们有更多需要刺激才能缓解的发作。两组在住院时间和出院时的婴儿体重方面没有差异。
在过渡到经口喂养期间使用鼻胃管补充喂养可提高出院时、出院后3天、3个月和6个月时进行母乳喂养的可能性。这种干预需要一个配备专业人员的项目以及一个允许母婴亲密接触的环境。进一步的研究应调查早产儿奶瓶喂养和母乳喂养对母亲信心、印记和吸吮机制影响的差异。