O'Connor J F, Singer M E, Richter J E
Center for Swallowing and Esophageal Disorders, Department of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Case Western Reserve University, Ohio 44195, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jun;94(6):1472-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.1129_p.x.
We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies to determine whether or not acid reflux exacerbates asthma, and to identify which asthma response probabilities are most important in a cost-effective workup of this problem.
We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing 11 diagnostic strategies to assess the role that acid reflux plays in asthma. Probabilities and costs were derived from the published literature. Average and incremental costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness were calculated for each strategy. Sensitivity analyses were performed.
The most cost-effective diagnostic approach is to begin with omeprazole 20 mg/day for 3 months, followed by 24-h pH testing on drug in nonresponders. If 24-h pH testing is positive, increase the omeprazole dose every 3 months until the patient responds or a maximum of 60 mg/day is given. This strategy costs $730 per case correctly diagnosed. When the cost of pH testing exceeds $586 or the cost of omeprazole 20 mg/day is <$53 per month, omeprazole 20 mg/day for 3 months followed by 60 mg/day for the same duration in nonresponders becomes more cost-effective.
Empiric acid reflux suppression, followed by pH testing in nonresponders, is the most cost-effective means of determining whether GERD is aggravating a patient's asthma.
我们试图评估诊断策略的成本效益,以确定胃酸反流是否会加重哮喘,并确定在针对该问题的成本效益评估中,哪些哮喘反应概率最为重要。
我们进行了一项成本效益分析,比较了11种诊断策略,以评估胃酸反流在哮喘中所起的作用。概率和成本来自已发表的文献。计算了每种策略的平均成本、增量成本、有效性和成本效益。进行了敏感性分析。
最具成本效益的诊断方法是先给予奥美拉唑20毫克/天,持续3个月,然后对无反应者进行药物治疗期间的24小时pH值检测。如果24小时pH值检测呈阳性,每3个月增加一次奥美拉唑剂量,直到患者有反应或最大剂量达到60毫克/天。这种策略每正确诊断一例病例的成本为730美元。当pH值检测成本超过586美元或奥美拉唑20毫克/天的成本低于每月53美元时,先给予奥美拉唑20毫克/天,持续3个月,然后对无反应者给予相同疗程的60毫克/天,成本效益更高。
经验性抑制胃酸反流,然后对无反应者进行pH值检测,是确定胃食管反流病是否加重患者哮喘的最具成本效益的方法。