Knafo D
Bar-Ilan University.
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1999;47(1):35-62. doi: 10.1177/00030651990470010801.
Despite the salient presence of Jews in the history of psychoanalysis, literature on the subject of anti-Semitism in the clinical setting is surprisingly sparse. This paper attempts to comprehend the reasons for the dearth of literature on this important topic. A clinical section then breaks the silence surrounding expressions of anti-Semitism in the consulting room. The major focus is on transference and countertransference reactions that arise with regard to anti-Semitism in the clinical setting. Since the first section is concerned with silence in the psychoanalytic community, its focus is primarily on countertransference issues that may hinder the analyst's understanding and use of anti-Semitic material. The second, clinical section focuses on the ways both transference and countertransference reactions combine and influence one another and how they may, when properly attended to, serve as catalytic tools for advancing therapeutic goals.
尽管犹太人在精神分析史上占据显著地位,但关于临床环境中反犹主义主题的文献却出奇地稀少。本文试图探究关于这一重要主题的文献匮乏的原因。随后的临床部分打破了围绕咨询室中反犹主义表达的沉默。主要关注点在于临床环境中出现的与反犹主义相关的移情和反移情反应。由于第一部分关注的是精神分析界的沉默,其重点主要在于可能阻碍分析师理解和运用反犹主义素材的反移情问题。第二部分临床内容聚焦于移情和反移情反应相互结合、相互影响的方式,以及在得到妥善处理时,它们如何能够成为推进治疗目标的催化工具。