Suppr超能文献

使用两种准分子激光进行近视性屈光性角膜切削术的双侧比较。

Bilateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia using two excimer lasers.

作者信息

Lipshitz I, Fisher L, Lazar M, Loewenstein A

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 1999 May-Jun;15(3):334-7. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-19990501-09.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in patients who underwent PRK using the Summit Apex (Omnimed) excimer laser in one eye and the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser in the other.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent PRK with the Summit Apex laser (Omnimed) in one eye and the Nidek laser (EC-5000) in the second and had at least 12 months of follow-up were included in this retrospective study (n=30). Uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity, final spherical equivalent refraction, and grade of subepithelial haze were compared. The average preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of eyes treated with the Summit laser was -6.00 D (range, -2.50 to -8.75 D), and for Nidek-treated eyes it was -5.57 D (range, -2.50 to -8.80 D).

RESULTS

Forty-seven percent of Summit-treated eyes and 53% of Nidek-treated eyes had uncorrected visual acuity of 6/6 or better; 61% of Summit-treated eyes and 63% of Nidek-treated eyes had uncorrected visual acuity of 6/7.5 or better; 95% of Summit-treated eyes and 95% of Nidek-treated eyes had uncorrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better (difference not statistically significant). Seventy-three percent of eyes treated with the Summit laser and 80% of eyes treated with the Nidek laser had a postoperative refraction within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia; 97% of Summit-treated eyes and 87% of Nidek-treated eyes had a postoperative spherical equivalent refraction within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia; the difference between the two lasers was not statistically significant. However, the percent of eyes with persistent hyperopia was smaller in the Nidek group after 3 months (P=.0062) and after 6 months (P=.07) than in the Summit group. Videokeratography was not done.

CONCLUSION

Both lasers were effective with relatively low side effects. No significant difference was found between the two lasers in postoperative uncorrected visual acuity or refractive outcome. Eyes operated with the Nidek laser had less persistent hyperopia and stabilized earlier.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术(PRK)患者一眼使用Summit Apex(Omnimed)准分子激光、另一眼使用Nidek EC - 5000准分子激光进行PRK的结果。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了所有连续的患者(n = 30),这些患者一眼接受了Summit Apex激光(Omnimed)的PRK,另一眼接受了Nidek激光(EC - 5000)的PRK,且至少随访了12个月。比较了未矫正和矫正视力、最终等效球镜度以及上皮下雾状混浊分级。用Summit激光治疗的眼睛术前平均等效球镜度为 - 6.00 D(范围,- 2.50至 - 8.75 D),用Nidek激光治疗的眼睛术前平均等效球镜度为 - 5.57 D(范围,- 2.50至 - 8.80 D)。

结果

用Summit激光治疗的眼睛中47%、用Nidek激光治疗的眼睛中53%的未矫正视力达到6/6或更好;用Summit激光治疗的眼睛中61%、用Nidek激光治疗的眼睛中63%的未矫正视力达到6/7.5或更好;用Summit激光治疗的眼睛中95%、用Nidek激光治疗的眼睛中95%的未矫正视力达到6/12或更好(差异无统计学意义)。用Summit激光治疗的眼睛中73%、用Nidek激光治疗的眼睛中80%的术后屈光在正视眼等效球镜度±0.50 D范围内;用Summit激光治疗的眼睛中97%、用Nidek激光治疗的眼睛中87%的术后等效球镜度在正视眼等效球镜度±1.00 D范围内;两种激光之间的差异无统计学意义。然而,Nidek组术后3个月(P = 0.0062)和6个月(P = 0.07)持续性远视眼的比例低于Summit组。未进行角膜地形图检查。

结论

两种激光均有效且副作用相对较低。两种激光在术后未矫正视力或屈光结果方面无显著差异。用Nidek激光手术的眼睛持续性远视较少且稳定得更早。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验