Haïat R, Piot O, Gallois H, Hanania G
Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier, Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999 Jun;33(6):953-9. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199906000-00017.
An open randomized hospital study conducted in 169 centers in France compared the blood pressure response to the first 36 h of treatment with perindopril (PER), 2 mg once daily, with that to captopril (CAP), 6.25 mg t.i.d., in 725 patients (mean age, 70 years; men, 67%) with echocardiographic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (fractional shortening, < or = 28%) due to ischemia (56.7%) or hypertension (34.5%) and a systolic blood pressure (SBP) > or = 120 mm Hg. Each dose of CAP induced a sharp and rapid decrease in blood pressure (maximum, 1.5-2 h); with PER, the decrease was gradual (maximum, 6 h) and variation was less marked. However, at 36 h, the decrease in blood pressure versus baseline was similar on both treatments. Over the 36-h period, there were 22 (3%) dropouts due to marked orthostatic hypotension (SBP, <90 mm Hg), and they were fewer with PER than with CAP: 16 cases in the CAP group versus six in the PER group (p = 0.036). At 36 h, heart rate was lower with CAP than with PER: 75.2 versus 77.5 beats/min, respectively (p = 0.039). As initial therapy for stabilized left ventricular systolic dysfunction, the first dose of PER (2 mg) induced a significantly smaller decrease in blood pressure than the first dose of CAP (6.25 mg); dropouts due to orthostatic hypotension were also significantly fewer with PER than with CAP.