Suppr超能文献

空气灌肠复位肠套叠失败:再次尝试是否值得?

Unsuccessful air-enema reduction of intussusception: is a second attempt worthwhile?

作者信息

Sandler A D, Ein S H, Connolly B, Daneman A, Filler R M

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Surgery, The University of lowa lowa City, lowa 52242, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 1999;15(3-4):214-6. doi: 10.1007/s003830050558.

Abstract

Pneumatic reduction of idiopathic intussusception is successful in about 80% of cases, while 60% of the failures are reduced at surgery without resection. To determine whether delayed, repeated attempts at enema reduction of failures would reduce the need for operation in selected cases, over a 2-year period (1994-1996 inclusive), 17 infants with idiopathic intussusception underwent delayed repeat enemas 2-19 h following the first failed attempt at reduction. Clinical parameters and radiologic findings were evaluated with respect to outcome. Ten intussusceptions were successfully reduced after the second attempt in 9 and after the fourth attempt in 1. Seven children underwent a laparotomy, 5 because of failure of progressive reduction at air enema (AE). Two were taken to surgery early in the series, 1 because of perforation during a second attempt and 1 while awaiting a third reduction attempt. The 10 successful reductions all showed progressive movement of the intussusceptum on each AE; the 2 who perforated failed to show progressive reduction on their second AE. Because of these cases, the remaining 5 were referred to surgery because of failure of progressive reduction of the intussusceptum on the second attempt. At laparotomy, of the 7 unsuccessful reductions, 4 required resection and 3 had difficult manual reduction. The presence of vomiting, a mass, and/or bloody stools were not predictors of outcome. Failures had higher body temperatures (38.1 +/- 0.3 vs 37.4 +/- 0.1 degrees C, P = 0.07), heart rates (153.7 +/- 8 vs 136.9 +/- 2.1 min, P = 0.03), and longer duration of symptoms (36.8 +/- 4 vs 21.3 +/- 3.6 h; P = 0.01) than successes. Delayed repeat AEs may be safe and effective in selected cases of idiopathic intussusception, but should be considered only if significant movement of the intussusceptum is noted at each attempt. The ideal time for repeat AE reduction prior to surgery is not established, but 2-4 h appears appropriate. Pyrexia, tachycardia, and duration of symptoms greater than 36 h are relative contraindications to this course of management.

摘要

特发性肠套叠的空气灌肠复位术在约80%的病例中成功,而60%复位失败的病例可在手术中无需切除而复位。为了确定对复位失败的病例延迟、重复进行灌肠复位是否会减少特定病例的手术需求,在2年期间(包括1994年至1996年),17例特发性肠套叠婴儿在首次复位尝试失败后2至19小时接受了延迟重复灌肠。根据结果评估临床参数和影像学表现。10例肠套叠在第二次尝试后成功复位,9例在第二次尝试成功,1例在第四次尝试成功。7名儿童接受了剖腹手术,5名是因为空气灌肠(AE)时渐进性复位失败。在该系列早期有2名儿童接受了手术,1名是因为第二次尝试时穿孔,1名是在等待第三次复位尝试时。10例成功复位的病例在每次AE时均显示套叠肠管有渐进性移动;2例穿孔的病例在第二次AE时未显示渐进性复位。由于这些病例,其余5例因第二次尝试时套叠肠管渐进性复位失败而被转诊手术。在剖腹手术中,7例复位失败的病例中,4例需要切除,3例手法复位困难。呕吐、肿块和/或血便的存在不是预后的预测因素。失败病例的体温(38.1±0.3 vs 37.4±0.1℃,P = 0.07)、心率(153.7±8 vs 136.9±2.1次/分钟,P = 0.03)和症状持续时间(36.8±4 vs 21.3±3.6小时;P = 0.01)均高于成功病例。延迟重复AE在特定的特发性肠套叠病例中可能是安全有效的,但仅在每次尝试时注意到套叠肠管有明显移动时才应考虑。手术前重复AE复位的理想时间尚未确定,但2至4小时似乎合适。发热、心动过速和症状持续时间超过36小时是该治疗方案的相对禁忌证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验