Bloomfield G, Saggi B, Blocher C, Sugerman H
Division of General/Trauma Surgery, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298-0519, USA.
J Trauma. 1999 Jun;46(6):1009-14; discussion 1014-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199906000-00005.
To determine the ability of an externally applied continuous negative abdominal pressure device (CNAP) to reverse the effects of elevated intra-abdominal pressure on the central nervous and cardiovascular systems.
Anesthetized, ventilated swine had catheters placed for measurement of intra-abdominal (IAP), intracranial (ICP), central venous, pulmonary artery, pulmonary artery occlusion, mean arterial, peak inspiratory, inferior vena cava, and femoral vein pressures. After the animals stabilized, baseline measurements were obtained. IAP was increased by incrementally instilling an isosmotic polyethylene glycol solution into the peritoneal cavity until it was 25 mm Hg above baseline. IAP was maintained at 25 mm Hg above baseline for 2 hours. CNAP was then applied for 2 hours. All parameters were remeasured 30 minutes after each increase in IAP, at 2 hours after attaining maximum IAP, and lastly at 2 hours after abdominal decompression. Cardiac index was maintained near baseline by volume expansion.
Elevation of IAP to 25 mm Hg above baseline for 2 hours caused increases (p<0.05) in central venous pressure (10.3+/-0.9 to 15.2+/-1.7), inferior vena cava pressure (13.0+/-1.0 to 29.5+/-1.5), femoral vein pressure (13.5+/-0.5 to 33.3+/-1.3), ICP (10.6+/-1.5 to 21.0+/-1.5), and peak inspiratory pressure (18.3+/-0.3 to 34.2+/-1.0). The mean arterial pressure (106.3+/-3.5 to 125.8+/-3.4), pulmonary artery pressure (24.3+/-2.3 to 31.3+/-1.7), and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure rose (12.3+/-0.9 to 17.5+/-3.5), but not significantly. Cardiac index (3.3+/-0.5 to 3.4+/-0.4) remained essentially unchanged. CNAP significantly (p<0.05) decreased IAP (30.7+/-1.3 to 18.2+/-1.3), central venous pressure (15.2+/-1.7 to 12.4+/-2.1), inferior vena cava (29.5+/-1.5 to 19.2+/-1.3), and ICP (21.0+/-1.5 to 16.2+/-1.3). Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (17.5+/-3.5 to 15.0+/-3.1) and peak inspiratory pressure (34.2+/-1.0 to 29.7+/-1.1) decreased, but not significantly.
Acutely elevated IAP causes a significant increase in ICP and impaired cardiovascular and pulmonary function. Abdominal decompression remains the standard of care for abdominal compartment syndrome. However, in patients in whom an increased IAP does not require surgical decompression, the results of this study suggest that externally applied CNAP may be of value.
确定外部应用的持续负压腹部装置(CNAP)逆转腹腔内压力升高对中枢神经和心血管系统影响的能力。
对麻醉、通气的猪放置导管以测量腹腔内(IAP)、颅内(ICP)、中心静脉、肺动脉、肺动脉闭塞、平均动脉、吸气峰值、下腔静脉和股静脉压力。动物稳定后,获取基线测量值。通过向腹腔内逐步注入等渗聚乙二醇溶液使IAP升高,直至比基线高25 mmHg。IAP维持在比基线高25 mmHg 2小时。然后应用CNAP 2小时。在每次IAP升高后30分钟、达到最大IAP后2小时以及最后在腹部减压后2小时重新测量所有参数。通过容量扩充使心脏指数维持在接近基线水平。
IAP升高至比基线高25 mmHg并维持2小时导致中心静脉压(从10.3±0.9升至15.2±1.7)、下腔静脉压(从13.0±1.0升至29.5±1.5)、股静脉压(从13.5±0.5升至33.3±1.3)、ICP(从10.6±1.5升至21.0±1.5)和吸气峰值压力(从18.3±0.3升至34.2±1.0)升高(p<0.05)。平均动脉压(从106.3±3.5升至125.8±3.4)、肺动脉压(从24.3±2.3升至31.3±1.7)和肺动脉闭塞压升高(从12.3±0.9升至17.5±3.5),但无显著差异。心脏指数(从3.3±0.5升至3.4±0.4)基本保持不变。CNAP显著(p<0.05)降低IAP(从30.7±1.3降至18.2±1.3)、中心静脉压(从15.2±1.7降至12.4±2.1)、下腔静脉压(从29.5±1.5降至19.2±1.3)和ICP(从21.0±1.5降至16.2±1.3)。肺动脉闭塞压(从17.5±3.5降至15.0±3.1)和吸气峰值压力(从34.2±1.0降至29.7±1.1)降低,但无显著差异。
急性升高的IAP导致ICP显著升高以及心血管和肺功能受损。腹部减压仍然是腹腔间隔室综合征的治疗标准。然而,对于IAP升高但不需要手术减压的患者,本研究结果表明外部应用CNAP可能有价值。