Maravall M
Institute for Theoretical Physics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 11794-3840, USA.
Network. 1999 Feb;10(1):15-39.
Several hypotheses concerning implementations of associative memory in the brain rely on analyses of the capabilities of simple network models. However, the low connectivity of cerebral networks imposes constraints which sometimes do not arise clearly from such analyses. We investigate an aspect of a simple, dilute network's operation that is sometimes overlooked, namely the setting of activation thresholds. An examination of several criteria for optimal threshold assignment affords several new insights. It becomes apparent that the network's capacity (which is simply derived) is insufficient to characterize the quality of its performance. We derive the degree of 'sparsification' or decrease in firing probability that arises from dilution, and also the consequent losses in representational ability, and propose that they should also be taken into account. To evaluate the model's performance and suitability, we argue that one should explicitly consider the trade-off that exists between storage of patterns and preservation of information, and its consequent constraints.
关于大脑中联想记忆实现的几种假说依赖于对简单网络模型能力的分析。然而,大脑网络的低连通性带来了一些限制,而这些限制有时在这类分析中并不明显。我们研究了一个简单的稀疏网络运行中有时被忽视的方面,即激活阈值的设定。对几种最优阈值分配标准的考察提供了一些新的见解。很明显,网络的容量(这很容易推导出来)不足以表征其性能的质量。我们推导了由稀疏化导致的“稀疏程度”或放电概率的降低,以及随之而来的表征能力的损失,并建议也应将它们考虑在内。为了评估模型的性能和适用性,我们认为应该明确考虑模式存储和信息保存之间存在的权衡及其随之而来的限制。