King C, Koliner A
Semin Nurse Manag. 1999 Mar;7(1):39-46.
Although implementation of Shared Governance appears to have failed, it failed primarily on the surface. Many staff nurses actively involved in the Shared Governance movement not only were empowered but were dramatically affected on a professional level. Several council chairpersons were empowered to assume management roles in the transition back to the hierarchial model--a manifestation of their professional growth and development. At the unit level, several units lobbied the new leadership to allow them to continue to do peer review and unit-based council management of unit governance issues. Three councils lobbied to continue to do their work, although in a modified role, in the reestablished hierarchial structure. The three remaining councils were those of Practice, Quality, and Research. If nurse leaders at any level within the organization are to guide their departments forward while in the throes of the current chaos in health care, they must develop and use their power bases, both formal and informal, as individuals and then as leaders. Russell Coile identifies the need for more clinical expertise (expert power) on the executive team of health care organizations. He predicts that 50% of the executive team will be nurses and physicians and that only health care executives with an MBA or financial backgrounds, who also have well-developed informal power bases with skills in relationship development, facilitation, and networking, will be part of the new system. Those with a diversified informal power base will be most successful in guiding their organization to its destination. The future for nursing leaders is in the sharing of information; it is about embracing diversity and recognizing the contributions others can make that are refreshingly different; it is also about clearly defining a balance in life, because balanced leaders who have found a way to nurture and meet their own needs are better positioned to do the same for others. Ultimately, understanding the impact of power in an organization, regardless of organizational structure, begins with understanding and defining your own power base.
尽管共享治理的实施似乎失败了,但主要只是表面上的失败。许多积极参与共享治理运动的 staff nurses 不仅获得了权力,而且在专业层面上受到了极大影响。几位理事会主席被赋予权力,在向层级模式过渡中承担管理角色,这是他们职业成长和发展的体现。在科室层面,几个科室游说新领导,允许他们继续进行同行评审以及基于科室的理事会对科室治理问题的管理。三个理事会游说在重新建立的层级结构中继续开展工作,尽管角色有所调整。剩下的三个理事会是实践、质量和研究理事会。如果组织内任何层级的护士领导者要在当前医疗保健的混乱局面中引领其部门前进,他们必须作为个人,然后作为领导者,发展并利用其正式和非正式的权力基础。拉塞尔·科伊尔指出,医疗保健组织的高管团队需要更多临床专业知识(专家权力)。他预测,高管团队的 50% 将是护士和医生,只有拥有工商管理硕士学位或财务背景、同时在关系发展、促进和建立网络方面拥有成熟非正式权力基础的医疗保健高管才会成为新体系的一部分。那些拥有多元化非正式权力基础的人在引领组织实现目标方面将最为成功。护理领导者的未来在于信息共享;在于接纳多样性并认识到他人能做出的令人耳目一新的不同贡献;还在于明确界定生活中的平衡,因为找到滋养和满足自身需求方法的平衡型领导者更有能力为他人做到同样的事情。归根结底,无论组织结构如何,理解权力在组织中的影响都始于理解和界定自己的权力基础。