Shapiro N L, Seid A B, Pransky S M, Kearns D B, Magit A E, Silva P
Pediatric Otolaryngology, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1999 May 5;48(2):109-15. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(99)00011-7.
Postoperative management of the patient younger than 36 months undergoing adenotonsillectomy has been the subject of many debates. Concerns for early postoperative complications such as airway obstruction, emesis, dehydration, and hemorrhage have led many physicians to consider overnight hospitalization following adenotonsillectomy in very young children. Trends in health care management have had increasing focus on cost effective means of treating patients to limit unnecessary expenditure on the part of the patient, physician, and hospital facility. The purpose of this retrospective review was to analyze two methods of early postoperative management in children less than 36 months old undergoing adenotonsillectomy at the Children's Hospital, San Diego from 1992 to 1997. Three hundred and seven cases were reviewed. Same-day discharge was compared with overnight inpatient observation based on the cost analysis of these two methods of postoperative care. Postoperative care was based on length of stay in the recovery room and as an inpatient. Expense of postoperative care was based on cost calculation for the recovery room and overnight hospitalization. Of the 307 patients, 194 went home the day of surgery and 113 were observed overnight in the hospital. Average hospital cost was higher in the outpatient group than in the inpatient group (P < 0.001). This difference reflects longer recovery room stay (350 min) in the outpatient group compared to the inpatient group (108 min) (P < 0.001). Outpatient adenotonsillectomy in the patient under 36 months may be safe; however, prolonged recovery room stays may actually make outpatient surgery less cost-effective than overnight admission. Recovery room costs are significantly higher per unit time than costs of inpatient hospitalization. Further investigation of cost-effective outpatient observation units may improve cost containment in the outpatient surgical setting.
36个月以下儿童行腺样体扁桃体切除术后的管理一直是诸多争论的焦点。对术后早期并发症如气道梗阻、呕吐、脱水和出血的担忧,致使许多医生考虑让非常年幼的儿童在腺样体扁桃体切除术后留院观察一晚。医疗管理趋势越来越注重以具有成本效益的方式治疗患者,以限制患者、医生和医院设施方面的不必要支出。本回顾性研究的目的是分析1992年至1997年在圣地亚哥儿童医院对36个月以下行腺样体扁桃体切除术的儿童采用的两种术后早期管理方法。共回顾了307例病例。基于这两种术后护理方法的成本分析,对当日出院与过夜住院观察进行了比较。术后护理基于在恢复室和住院的时长。术后护理费用基于恢复室和过夜住院的成本计算。在307例患者中,194例在手术当天回家,113例在医院过夜观察。门诊组的平均住院费用高于住院组(P < 0.001)。这种差异反映出门诊组在恢复室的停留时间(350分钟)比住院组(108分钟)更长(P < 0.001)。36个月以下患者的门诊腺样体扁桃体切除术可能是安全的;然而,恢复室停留时间延长实际上可能使门诊手术的成本效益低于过夜住院。恢复室每单位时间的成本显著高于住院费用。对具有成本效益的门诊观察单元进行进一步研究,可能会改善门诊手术环境中的成本控制。