Hassen A, Wilson D E, Amin V R, Rouse G H
Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA.
J Anim Sci. 1999 Jun;77(6):1335-40. doi: 10.2527/1999.7761335x.
We used data from 144 bulls, heifers, and steers to determine the repeatability of ultrasound-predicted percentage of intramuscular fat and to study the effect of repeated measurements on the standard error of prediction. Animals were scanned at an average age of 433 d by a certified technician. Individual bulls, heifers, and steers were scanned five to six times each with two Aloka 500-V machines, and the percentage of intramuscular fat was predicted from two regions of interest within an image. Variance components and repeatability values were computed for the overall data and by machine, region of interest, and sex. Animals were broadly divided into two groups based on mean ultrasound-predicted percentage of intramuscular fat. Variance components and repeatability values were then estimated within each group. The overall repeatability of ultrasound-predicted percentage of intramuscular fat was .63 +/- .03. Differences in the repeatability values between machines and between regions of interest were not different from zero (P > .05). Bulls showed a lower within-animal SD of .82% as compared to .97 and 1.02% for steers and heifers, respectively. However, steer ultrasound-predicted percentage of intramuscular fat measures were more repeatable (P < .05) than those of bulls and heifers. The difference in repeatability between bull and heifer measures was not important (P > .05). Animals with mean ultrasound-predicted percentage of intramuscular fat less than 4.79% showed less repeatable measures (P < .05) than those with means above 4.79%. The image variance contributed to nearly 70% of the total variance of observations within an animal. Standard error of animal mean measures showed a 50% reduction when the number of images per animal increased to four. Therefore, we concluded that increasing the number of images per animal plays a more significant role in reducing the standard error of prediction than taking multiple measurements within a single image.
我们使用了来自144头公牛、小母牛和阉牛的数据,以确定超声预测的肌内脂肪百分比的重复性,并研究重复测量对预测标准误差的影响。由一名认证技术人员在动物平均年龄433天时进行扫描。使用两台阿洛卡500-V机器对每头公牛、小母牛和阉牛分别进行五到六次扫描,并从图像中的两个感兴趣区域预测肌内脂肪百分比。计算了总体数据以及按机器、感兴趣区域和性别分类的方差成分和重复性值。根据超声预测的肌内脂肪平均百分比,将动物大致分为两组。然后在每组内估计方差成分和重复性值。超声预测的肌内脂肪百分比的总体重复性为0.63±0.03。不同机器之间以及不同感兴趣区域之间的重复性值差异与零无显著差异(P>0.05)。公牛的动物内标准差较低,为0.82%,而阉牛和小母牛分别为0.97%和1.02%。然而,阉牛超声预测的肌内脂肪测量值比公牛和小母牛的测量值更具重复性(P<0.05)。公牛和小母牛测量值之间的重复性差异不显著(P>0.05)。超声预测的肌内脂肪平均百分比低于4.79%的动物,其测量值的重复性低于平均值高于4.79%的动物(P<0.05)。图像方差占动物内部观测总方差的近70%。当每只动物的图像数量增加到四张时,动物平均测量值的标准误差降低了50%。因此,我们得出结论,增加每只动物的图像数量在降低预测标准误差方面比在单个图像内进行多次测量发挥着更重要的作用。