Suppr超能文献

[老年单纯收缩期高血压患者的主动脉壁扩张性及左心室结构与功能]

[Aortic wall distensibility and the structure and function of the left ventricle in aged persons with isolated systolic hypertension].

作者信息

Ivanović-Krstić B, Kalimanovska-Ostrić D, Svetković-Matić D, Nikcević Dj, Simić D, Stević S, Sujeranović D

机构信息

Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade.

出版信息

Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1999 Jan-Feb;127(1-2):10-5.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The number of old persons (over 65 years) with arterial hypertension is in a steady increase [1]. Such finding is mainly related to patients with isolated systolic hypertension. They present more than 60% of old persons with arterial hypertension [2]. Isolated systolic hypertension can be defined as increased systolic blood pressure to the value more than 160 mmHg and diastolic pressure to 90-95 mmHg [4, 5]. It has been suggested that the pathologic basis of this entity is in a decreased distensibility of aorta and great arteries. In patients with isolated systolic hypertension we studied the correlation between decreased aortic distensibility and systolic arterial blood pressure value. We also evaluated changes in the left ventricular structure and function during this type of hypertension.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined 59 patients older than 65 years. They were divided in two subgroups. First subgroup: 38 patients (74 +/- 11 years) with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) and the second subgroup: 21 normotensive persons (NT) (73 +/- 6 years). Aortic distensibility was calculated by the formula: Aortic dystensibility = difference between aortic diameters/diameter aortae in diastole x pulse pressure. The ascending aortic diameters were measured 4 cm above the aortic valve by two dimensional echocardiography and pulse pressure was measured simultaneously by sphingomanometry. Using M-mod and two-dimensional echocardiography we measured end-diastolic (EDD) and end-systolic (ESD) left ventricular diameters and thickness of interventricular septum (IVS) and posterior wall (ZZ). We calculated the ejection fraction (EF) using Teichole formula. Changes in left ventricular structure were expressed by sum of interventricular septum and posterior wall thickness and left ventricular mass. We calculated left ventricular mass using the following formula: MLK = /EDD + IVS + ZZ)3 - EDD/ x 1.05. By pulse Doppler echocardiography we measured the peak velocity of the left ventricular filling (VE) and calculated the ratio between early and late peak velocity (VE/VA).

RESULTS

Aortic distensibility was significantly lower in patients with isolated systolic hypertension than in normotensive subjects (0.10 +/- 0.02 x 1/100 1/mmHg vs 0.24 +/- 0.04 x 1/100 1/mmHg; p < 0.05). Such findings are presented in Table 1. At the same time, we found a significantly inversed correlation between aortic distensibility and systolic blood pressure value in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (r = 0.67; p < 0.05). From Table 2 it is visible that there were no significant differences between left ventricular diameter and mass in hypertensive patients. The sum of interventricular septum and posterior wall thickness was significantly greater in patients with isolated systolic hypertension than in normotensive patients (2.19 +/- 0.5 cm v.s. 1.93 +/- 0.4 cm; p < 0.05). This finding is also presented in Table 2. We found no statistically significant differences among the ejection fraction values in the studied subgroups (Table 3). The peak velocity of early filling and the ratio of early to late peak velocities were significantly lower in the hypertensive subgroup (0.4 m/s v.s. 0.54 m/s; p < 0.05; 0.69 v.s. 0.76; p < 0.05) (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

In old persons with isolated systolic hypertension we found that aortic distensibility was significantly lower in comparison to normotensive subjects of the same age. Such finding supports the hypothesis that the reduced aortic distensibility is the cause of isolated systolic hypertension. At the same time, we found the inversed correlation between aortic distensibility and the mean systolic blood pressure value. Aging has an effect on reduction of aortic and great vessels distensibility. Thus, it causes arterial hypertension which changes the elastic properties of aorta. It is still questionable in which degree the systolic blood pressure value compromises the elastic properties of aorta. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

摘要

未标注

65岁以上患有动脉高血压的老年人数量正在稳步增加[1]。这一发现主要与单纯收缩期高血压患者有关。他们占患有动脉高血压老年人的60%以上[2]。单纯收缩期高血压可定义为收缩压升高至超过160 mmHg,舒张压为90 - 95 mmHg[4,5]。有人认为,这种情况的病理基础是主动脉和大动脉的扩张性降低。在单纯收缩期高血压患者中,我们研究了主动脉扩张性降低与收缩期动脉血压值之间的相关性。我们还评估了这种类型高血压期间左心室结构和功能的变化。

患者与方法

我们检查了59名65岁以上的患者。他们被分为两个亚组。第一亚组:38例(74±11岁)单纯收缩期高血压(ISH)患者,第二亚组:21例血压正常者(NT)(73±6岁)。主动脉扩张性通过以下公式计算:主动脉扩张性=主动脉直径之差/舒张期主动脉直径×脉压。通过二维超声心动图在主动脉瓣上方4 cm处测量升主动脉直径,同时通过血压计测量脉压。使用M型和二维超声心动图,我们测量舒张末期(EDD)和收缩末期(ESD)左心室直径以及室间隔(IVS)和后壁(ZZ)厚度。我们使用Teichole公式计算射血分数(EF)。左心室结构的变化用室间隔和后壁厚度之和以及左心室质量表示。我们使用以下公式计算左心室质量:MLK = /EDD + IVS + ZZ)3 - EDD/×1.05。通过脉冲多普勒超声心动图,我们测量左心室充盈的峰值速度(VE),并计算早期和晚期峰值速度之比(VE/VA)。

结果

单纯收缩期高血压患者的主动脉扩张性显著低于血压正常者(0.10±0.02×1/100 1/mmHg对0.24±0.04×1/100 1/mmHg;p<0.05)。这些结果见表1。同时,我们发现单纯收缩期高血压患者的主动脉扩张性与收缩压值之间存在显著的负相关(r = 0.67;p<0.05)。从表2可以看出,高血压患者的左心室直径和质量之间没有显著差异。单纯收缩期高血压患者的室间隔和后壁厚度之和显著大于血压正常患者(2.19±0.5 cm对1.93±0.4 cm;p<0.05)。这一结果也见表2。我们发现研究亚组之间的射血分数值没有统计学显著差异(表3)。高血压亚组的早期充盈峰值速度和早期与晚期峰值速度之比显著较低(0.4 m/s对0.54 m/s;p<0.05;0.69对0.76;p<0.05)(表3)。

讨论

在单纯收缩期高血压的老年人中,我们发现与同年龄的血压正常者相比,主动脉扩张性显著降低。这一发现支持了主动脉扩张性降低是单纯收缩期高血压病因的假说。同时,我们发现主动脉扩张性与平均收缩压值之间存在负相关。衰老会影响主动脉和大血管扩张性的降低。因此,它会导致动脉高血压,从而改变主动脉的弹性特性。收缩压值在多大程度上损害主动脉的弹性特性仍存在疑问。(摘要截断)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验