Suppr超能文献

意外怀孕导致的活产:各州之间存在差异吗?PRAMS 工作组。

Live births resulting from unintended pregnancies: is there variation among states? The PRAMS Working Group.

作者信息

Dietz P M, Adams M M, Spitz A M, Morris L, Johnson C H

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 May-Jun;31(3):132-6.

Abstract

CONTEXT

States need data on live births resulting from unintended pregnancies in order to assess the need for family planning services; however, many states do not collect such data. Some states may use extrapolated rates from other states.

METHODS

Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data were assessed to explore the feasibility of extrapolating data on the percentage of live births resulting from unintended pregnancies from states that collect these data to states that do not. Data on women who had live births between 1993 and 1995 were examined for eight states: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, New York (excluding New York City), Oklahoma, South Carolina and West Virginia. Logistic regression was used to determine state variation in the odds of delivering a live birth resulting from an unintended pregnancy after adjustment for maternal race, marital status, age, education, previous live birth and participation in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC).

RESULTS

The percentage of live births resulting from unintended pregnancy ranged from 33% in New York to 49% in Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina. Compared with women in Alabama, women in Oklahoma were more likely to deliver a live birth resulting from an unintended pregnancy (odds ratio of 1.2, confidence interval of 1.1-1.3) and women in New York State were less likely (odds ratio of 0.7, confidence interval of 0.6-0.8) to have such a birth. However, unmarried white women in New York had lower odds of having a live birth resulting from an unintended pregnancy and married black women in Michigan had higher odds of having a live birth resulting from unintended pregnancy than their counterparts in Alabama. Although the percentages varied, in all eight states women who were black, were unmarried, were younger than 20 years of age, had less than 12 years of education or had more than one child had higher percentages of live births resulting from unintended pregnancy than women with other demographic characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Data on which women have the greatest risk of delivering a live birth resulting from an unintended pregnancy may be extrapolated from one state to another, but the rate of such births may overestimate or underestimate the problem from one state to another.

摘要

背景

各州需要意外怀孕活产的数据,以便评估计划生育服务的需求;然而,许多州并未收集此类数据。一些州可能会采用其他州的外推率。

方法

对妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)的数据进行评估,以探讨将收集意外怀孕活产百分比数据的州的数据外推至未收集此类数据的州的可行性。对1993年至1995年间有活产的女性数据进行了研究,涉及八个州:阿拉巴马州、佛罗里达州、佐治亚州、密歇根州、纽约州(不包括纽约市)、俄克拉荷马州、南卡罗来纳州和西弗吉尼亚州。使用逻辑回归来确定在调整了产妇种族、婚姻状况、年龄、教育程度、既往活产情况以及参与妇女、婴儿和儿童特别补充营养计划(WIC)之后,意外怀孕活产几率的州际差异。

结果

意外怀孕活产的百分比在纽约州为33%,在阿拉巴马州、佐治亚州和南卡罗来纳州为49%。与阿拉巴马州的女性相比,俄克拉荷马州的女性更有可能意外怀孕活产(优势比为1.2,置信区间为1.1 - 1.3),而纽约州的女性意外怀孕活产的可能性较小(优势比为0.7,置信区间为0.6 - 0.8)。然而,纽约州未婚白人女性意外怀孕活产的几率较低,而密歇根州已婚黑人女性意外怀孕活产的几率高于阿拉巴马州的同类女性。尽管百分比有所不同,但在所有八个州中,黑人、未婚、年龄小于20岁、受教育年限少于12年或有多个孩子的女性,意外怀孕活产的百分比高于具有其他人口统计学特征的女性。

结论

关于哪些女性意外怀孕活产风险最大的数据可以在州与州之间进行外推,但此类出生的比率在不同州之间可能会高估或低估问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验