Bauer L O, Hesselbrock V M
Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 1999 Jul;21(1):51-62. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(98)00139-0.
The goal of the present study was to identify neurophysiological differences associated with a family history of substance dependence, and its subtypes (paternal alcohol, cocaine, or opiate dependence), and with conduct disorder, and its subtypes (aggression, deceitfulness/theft, and rules violations). P300 event-related brain potentials were recorded from 210 males and females, aged 15-20 years while they performed the Stroop color-word compatibility test. Analyses revealed no significant effects of familial substance dependence on P300. However, an elevated number of conduct disorder problems was associated with a statistically significant reduction in P300 amplitude. The P300 amplitude reduction was related to the severity of the "rules violation" subtype, but was unrelated to aggression or deceitfulness and theft. It is concluded that conduct disorder can explain many of the P300 findings previously attributed to a family history of alcohol dependence. Furthermore, it appears that conduct disorder may be a heterogenous classification comprised of neurophysiologically different subtypes.
本研究的目的是确定与物质依赖家族史及其亚型(父亲酒精、可卡因或阿片类物质依赖)以及品行障碍及其亚型(攻击行为、欺骗/盗窃和违反规则)相关的神经生理学差异。在210名年龄在15至20岁的男性和女性进行斯特鲁普颜色-文字匹配测试时,记录了P300事件相关脑电位。分析显示,家族性物质依赖对P300没有显著影响。然而,品行障碍问题数量的增加与P300波幅在统计学上的显著降低相关。P300波幅降低与“违反规则”亚型的严重程度有关,但与攻击行为、欺骗或盗窃无关。得出的结论是,品行障碍可以解释许多先前归因于酒精依赖家族史的P300研究结果。此外,品行障碍似乎可能是一种由神经生理学上不同亚型组成的异质性分类。