两级流程能否消除代价高昂的规划问题？
Could two-level process eliminate costly planning problems?
作者信息
Tusler W
出版信息
Hospitals. 1979 Feb 16;53(4):85-90.
PMID:103798
Abstract
Lack of concurrent review and incompatibility with cost containment objectives are serious problems with the present certificate-of-need approval process.
摘要
缺乏同步审查以及与成本控制目标不兼容是当前需求证明审批流程存在的严重问题。
相似文献
1
Could two-level process eliminate costly planning problems?两级流程能否消除代价高昂的规划问题？
Hospitals. 1979 Feb 16;53(4):85-90.
2
Certificate of need and the pitfalls of due process.需求证明与正当程序的陷阱
Inquiry. 1980 Winter;17(4):348-56.
3
Regs control the planning process as well as the plan.法规既控制规划过程，也控制规划本身。
Hospitals. 1980 Apr 16;54(8):51-4.
4
HSAs misuse draft CON checklist.健康储蓄账户（HSAs）误用草案CON清单。
Mod Healthc. 1979 Nov;9(11):30.
5
Living with an allowance: Maine hospitals review new capital-spending limits.在预算范围内运营：缅因州医院审查新的资本支出限制。
Mod Healthc. 2004 Sep 6;34(36):12-3.
6
A critique of the Massachusetts determination of need program.
N Engl J Med. 1979 Apr 5;300(14):794-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197904053001412.
7
Health planning amendments will add to hospitals' certificate-of-need burdens.医疗规划修正案将增加医院的需求证明负担。
Hosp Forum. 1980 Apr-May;23(3):47-8.
8
HSA must abide by its own rules, court says.法院称，医保储蓄账户（HSA）必须遵守其自身规定。
Mod Healthc. 1979 Apr;9(4):70-1.
9
Hospital awarded CON for shelled space.医院获得了用于外壳空间的建设许可。
Hosp Prog. 1979 Apr;60(4):84.
10
The politics of getting a certificate of need.获取需求证明的政治因素。
Trustee. 1977 May;30(5):35-8.
Zotero 插件