Pamjav H, Triga D, Buzás Z, Vellai T, Lucskai A, Adams B, Reid A P, Burnell A, Griffin C, Glazer I, Klein M G, Fodor A
Department of Genetics, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.
Electrophoresis. 1999 Jun;20(6):1266-73. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990101)20:6<1266::AID-ELPS1266>3.0.CO;2-4.
différences! [editorial] [editorial]onomic way of identifying and assigning nematodes to taxons, which had already been determined either by comparative sequence analysis of nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region or by other methods of molecular or conventional taxonomy, is provided. Molecular identification of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) can be upgraded by basing it on PhastSystem polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified DNA derived from single nematodes of Steinernema or Heterorhabditis spp. Although analysis from single worms has previously been made on agarose gel, the resolution on PhastSystem PAGE gel is much higher. The DNA sequences selected for analysis were those constituting the internal transcribed spacer region between the 18S and 26S rDNA genes within the rRNA operon. RFLP analysis was carried out by gel electrophoresis on the PhastSystem (Pharmacia) as detailed elsewhere (Triga et al., Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 1272-1277. The downscaling from conventional agarose to PhastSystem gels resulted in pattern of DNA fragments differing from those obtained with agarose gel electrophoresis under conventional conditions by increasing the number of detected fragments. The approach supported previous species identifications and was able to identify several unclassified isolates, such as those from Hungary and Ireland, and provides a method for identification of previously unclassified strains. We confirmed that Heterorhabditis "Irish Type", represented by two strains of different geographical origin, comprise a species different from H. megidis. We also confirmed that strain IS5 belongs to the species H. indicus rather than to H. bacteriophora, as had been suggested previously.
差异![社论][社论]提供了一种经济的方法来识别线虫并将其归类到分类单元,这些分类单元已经通过核糖体DNA内部转录间隔区(ITS)区域的比较序列分析或其他分子或传统分类学方法确定。昆虫病原线虫(EPN)的分子鉴定可以通过基于PhastSystem聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(PAGE)分析来自斯氏线虫属或异小杆线虫属单个线虫的聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增DNA的限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)模式来升级。尽管之前已经在琼脂糖凝胶上对单条线虫进行了分析,但PhastSystem PAGE凝胶上的分辨率要高得多。选择用于分析的DNA序列是构成rRNA操纵子中18S和26S rDNA基因之间内部转录间隔区的序列。RFLP分析在PhastSystem(Pharmacia)上通过凝胶电泳进行,详细方法见其他地方(Triga等人,《电泳》1999年,20卷,1272 - 1277页)。从传统琼脂糖凝胶到PhastSystem凝胶的缩小规模导致DNA片段模式与传统条件下琼脂糖凝胶电泳获得的模式不同,检测到的片段数量增加。该方法支持之前的物种鉴定,能够鉴定几种未分类的分离株,如来自匈牙利和爱尔兰的分离株,并提供了一种鉴定之前未分类菌株的方法。我们证实由两个不同地理来源的菌株代表的异小杆线虫“爱尔兰类型”是一个不同于大卵异小杆线虫的物种。我们还证实IS5菌株属于印度异小杆线虫物种,而不是如之前所认为的属于嗜菌异小杆线虫。