Trostdorf F, Reinert R R, Schmidt H, Nichterlein T, Stuertz K, Schmitz-Salue M, Sadowski I, Brück W, Nau R
Department of Neurology, University of Göttingen, Germany.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Jan;43(1):87-94. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.1.87.
The inflammatory response following initiation of antibiotic therapy and parameters of neuronal damage were compared during intravenous treatment with quinupristin/dalfopristin (100 mg/kg as either a short or a continuous infusion) and ceftriaxone (10 mg/kg/h) in a rabbit model of Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. With both modes of administration, quinupristin/dalfopristin was less bactericidal than ceftriaxone. However, the concentration of proinflammatory cell wall components (lipoteichoic acid (LTA) and teichoic acid (TA)) and the activity of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were significantly lower in the two quinupristin/dalfopristin groups than in ceftriaxone-treated rabbits. The median LTA/TA concentrations (25th/75th percentiles) were as follows: (i) 14 h after infection: 133 (72/155) ng/mL for continuous infusion of quinupristin/dalfopristin and 193 (91/308) ng/mL for short duration infusion, compared with 455 (274/2042) ng/mL for ceftriaxone (P = 0.002 and 0.02 respectively); (ii) 17 h after infection: 116 (60/368) ng/mL for continuous infusion of quinupristin/dalfopristin and 117 (41/247) ng/mL for short duration infusion, compared with 694 (156/2173) ng/mL for ceftriaxone (P = 0.04 and 0.03 respectively). Fourteen hours after infection the median TNF activity (25th/75th percentiles) was 0.2 (0.1/1.9) U/mL for continuous infusion of quinupristin/dalfopristin and 0.1 (0.01/3.5) U/mL for short duration infusion, compared with 30 (4.6/180) U/mL for ceftriaxone (P = 0.02 for each comparison); 17 h after infection the TNF activity was 2.8 (0.2/11) U/mL (continuous infusion of quinupristin/dalfopristin) and 0.1 (0.04/6.1) U/mL (short duration infusion), compared with 48.6 (18/169) U/mL for ceftriaxone (P = 0.002 and 0.001). The concentration of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) 24 h after infection was significantly lower in animals treated with quinupristin/dalfopristin: 4.6 (3.3/5.7) microg/L (continuous infusion) and 3.6 (2.9/4.7) microg/L (short duration infusion) than in those treated with ceftriaxone (17.7 (8.8/78.2) microg/L) (P = 0.03 and 0.009 respectively). In conclusion, antibiotic treatment with quinupristin/dalfopristin attenuated the inflammatory response within the subarachnoid space after initiation of antibiotic therapy. The concentration of NSE in the CSF, taken as a measure of neuronal damage, was lower in quinupristin/dalfopristin-treated rabbits than in ceftriaxone-treated rabbits.
在肺炎链球菌脑膜炎兔模型中,比较了静脉注射奎奴普丁/达福普汀(100mg/kg,短期或持续输注)和头孢曲松(10mg/kg/h)期间抗生素治疗开始后的炎症反应及神经元损伤参数。两种给药方式下,奎奴普丁/达福普汀的杀菌作用均弱于头孢曲松。然而,两个奎奴普丁/达福普汀组脑脊液(CSF)中促炎细胞壁成分(脂磷壁酸(LTA)和磷壁酸(TA))的浓度及肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)的活性均显著低于头孢曲松治疗的兔子。LTA/TA浓度中位数(第25/75百分位数)如下:(i)感染后14小时:持续输注奎奴普丁/达福普汀为133(72/155)ng/mL,短期输注为193(91/308)ng/mL,而头孢曲松为455(274/2042)ng/mL(分别P = 0.002和0.02);(ii)感染后17小时:持续输注奎奴普丁/达福普汀为116(60/368)ng/mL,短期输注为117(41/247)ng/mL,而头孢曲松为694(156/2173)ng/mL(分别P = 0.04和0.03)。感染后14小时,持续输注奎奴普丁/达福普汀时TNF活性中位数(第25/75百分位数)为0.2(0.1/1.9)U/mL,短期输注为0.1(0.01/3.5)U/mL,而头孢曲松为30(4.6/180)U/mL(每次比较P = 其0.02);感染后17小时,TNF活性为2.8(0.2/11)U/mL(持续输注奎奴普丁/达福普汀)和0.1(0.04/6.1)U/mL(短期输注),而头孢曲松为48.6(18/169)U/mL(分别P = 0.002和0.001)。感染后24小时,用奎奴普丁/达福普汀治疗的动物中神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)浓度显著低于用头孢曲松治疗的动物:持续输注时为4.6(3.3/5.7)μg/L,短期输注时为3.6(2.9/4.7)μg/L,而头孢曲松治疗组为17.7(8.8/78.2)μg/L(分别P = 0.03和0.009)。总之,抗生素治疗中使用奎奴普丁/达福普汀可减轻抗生素治疗开始后蛛网膜下腔内的炎症反应。以CSF中NSE浓度作为神经元损伤的指标,用奎奴普丁/达福普汀治疗的兔子低于用头孢曲松治疗的兔子。