Suppr超能文献

奥美拉唑与雷尼替丁对症状性治疗反应不佳的胃酸反流病的疗效——一项前瞻性对照试验。

Efficacy of omeprazole versus ranitidine for symptomatic treatment of poorly responsive acid reflux disease-a prospective, controlled trial.

作者信息

Maton P N, Orlando R, Joelsson B

机构信息

Digestive Disease Research Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, USA.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Jun;13(6):819-26. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00527.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

H2-receptor antagonists are widely used in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and are frequently continued when symptoms persist.

AIM

To compare the efficacy of omeprazole 20 mg once daily with that of ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in relieving GERD symptoms, in patients who remained symptomatic following a 6-week course of ranitidine therapy.

METHODS

Patients with heartburn on at least 4 days/week but who did not have endoscopy to assess oesophageal mucosa could participate. This two-phase, prospective trial included a 6-week open-label phase (phase I), followed by an 8-week double-blind phase (phase II). Patients still symptomatic following treatment with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (phase I) were randomized to double-blind treatment (phase II) with either omeprazole 20 mg once daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients with heartburn resolution during weeks 4 and 8 of phase II.

RESULTS

Of the 533 patients with GERD who received ranitidine in phase I, 348 patients (65%) were still symptomatic. A total of 317 patients (59%) were randomized to double-blind treatment (phase II). At week 8, a significantly (P < 0.0004) greater proportion of omeprazole-treated patients (70%) experienced no more than mild heartburn compared with ranitidine-treated patients (49%). Complete resolution of heartburn also occurred in a significantly (P < 0. 00001) greater proportion of omeprazole-treated patients (46% vs. 16% of the ranitidine group at week 8).

CONCLUSIONS

After 6 weeks of ranitidine treatment, the majority of patients with GERD were still experiencing moderate to severe heartburn. Omeprazole was significantly more effective than ranitidine in resolving heartburn in this group of patients.

摘要

背景

H2受体拮抗剂广泛应用于胃食管反流病(GERD)患者,症状持续时常常继续使用。

目的

比较在雷尼替丁治疗6周后仍有症状的患者中,每日一次服用20mg奥美拉唑与每日两次服用150mg雷尼替丁缓解GERD症状的疗效。

方法

每周至少有4天出现烧心症状但未接受内镜检查以评估食管黏膜的患者可参与。这项两阶段的前瞻性试验包括一个为期6周的开放标签阶段(第一阶段),随后是一个为期8周的双盲阶段(第二阶段)。在第一阶段接受每日两次150mg雷尼替丁治疗后仍有症状的患者被随机分配至双盲治疗(第二阶段),分别每日一次服用20mg奥美拉唑或每日两次服用150mg雷尼替丁。主要疗效变量是第二阶段第4周和第8周烧心症状缓解的患者比例。

结果

在第一阶段接受雷尼替丁治疗的533例GERD患者中,348例(65%)仍有症状。共有317例患者(59%)被随机分配至双盲治疗(第二阶段)。在第8周时,与雷尼替丁治疗的患者(49%)相比,接受奥美拉唑治疗的患者中烧心症状不超过轻度的比例显著更高(70%,P<0.0004)。在第8周时,接受奥美拉唑治疗的患者烧心症状完全缓解的比例也显著更高(46%,而雷尼替丁组为16%,P<0.00001)。

结论

雷尼替丁治疗6周后,大多数GERD患者仍有中度至重度烧心症状。在这组患者中,奥美拉唑在缓解烧心症状方面明显比雷尼替丁更有效。

相似文献

6
Efficacy of omeprazole for the treatment of symptomatic acid reflux disease without esophagitis.
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jun 26;160(12):1810-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.12.1810.
7
Lansoprazole compared with ranitidine for the treatment of nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jun 26;160(12):1803-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.12.1803.
9
Complete resolution of heartburn symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Dec;13(12):1621-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00669.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验