Forstner K
Forschungsinstitut für klinische Medizintechnik, Asperg.
Fortschr Med. 1999 Apr 10;117(10):22-5.
Automatic blood pressure measuring devices with digital display are now in common use, both among lay persons and physicians. The oscillometric method is, however, associated with a number of possible sources of error which, among other things, make comparison with the standard Riva-Rocci method difficult. Methodological errors arise from physiological/anatomical variations: circumference of the forearm and wrist, position of the arteries, structure of the surrounding tissue, arterial diameter and also vasomotor function. The latter represents an appreciable uncertainty factor, in particular with measurements obtained from the finger. Technological sources of error play a role in pronounced hypotension or severe hypertension, since the devices are calibrated only for a range extending from 120 to 180 mmHg. The processing by the device of arrhythmic pulses is also critical. Additional sources of error are in handling and interpretation. Overall, these sources of error are such that not all the various types of device available are equally suitable for use by the patient, and it is necessary to place limitations on the application of such devices and to establish rules for their use.
如今,带数字显示屏的自动血压测量设备在普通民众和医生中都已普遍使用。然而,示波法存在一些可能的误差来源,这使得与标准的里瓦-罗西法进行比较变得困难。方法学误差源于生理/解剖学变异:前臂和手腕的周长、动脉位置、周围组织的结构、动脉直径以及血管舒缩功能。后者是一个相当大的不确定因素,尤其是从手指测量时。技术误差源在明显低血压或严重高血压情况下起作用,因为这些设备仅针对120至180 mmHg的范围进行校准。设备对心律失常脉搏的处理也很关键。其他误差来源在于操作和解读。总体而言,这些误差来源使得并非所有现有的各类设备都同样适合患者使用,因此有必要对这类设备的应用加以限制并制定使用规则。