Turner G, Shepherd J
Health Education Unit, School of Education, University of Southampton, UK.
Health Educ Res. 1999 Apr;14(2):235-47. doi: 10.1093/her/14.2.235.
Peer education has grown in popularity and practice in recent years in the field of health promotion. However, advocates of peer education rarely make reference to theories in their rationale for particular projects. In this paper the authors review a selection of commonly cited theories, and examine to what extent they have value and relevance to peer education in health promotion. Beginning from an identification of 10 claims made for peer education, each theory is examined in terms of the scope of the theory and evidence to support it in practice. The authors conclude that, whilst most theories have something to offer towards an explanation of why peer education might be effective, most theories are limited in scope and there is little empirical evidence in health promotion practice to support them. Peer education would seem to be a method in search of a theory rather than the application of theory to practice.
近年来,同伴教育在健康促进领域越来越受欢迎且得到广泛应用。然而,同伴教育的倡导者在阐述特定项目的基本原理时很少提及相关理论。在本文中,作者回顾了一系列经常被引用的理论,并探讨它们在多大程度上对健康促进中的同伴教育具有价值和相关性。从确定有关同伴教育的10个主张入手,针对每个理论,作者从理论范围以及实践中支持该理论的证据这两个方面进行了考察。作者得出结论,虽然大多数理论在解释同伴教育为何可能有效方面都有一定作用,但大多数理论的范围有限,而且在健康促进实践中几乎没有实证证据来支持它们。同伴教育似乎是一种寻求理论的方法,而不是将理论应用于实践。