Albrecht S, Ihmsen H, Hering W, Geisslinger G, Dingemanse J, Schwilden H, Schüttler J
Department of Anesthesiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Jun;65(6):630-9. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(99)90084-X.
We investigated the pharmacologic properties of midazolam with special regard to age using the electroencephalogram (EEG) as a measure of the hypnotic-sedative effect.
Nine younger (24 to 28 years) and nine elderly (67 to 81 years) male volunteers received midazolam by a computer-controlled device. Two infusion cycles with linearly increasing target plasma levels (slope, 40 ng/mL/min for the younger subjects; 20 ng/mL/min for the elderly subjects) were administered until defined end points were attained (median EEG frequency <4 Hz and loss of responsiveness to acoustic stimuli). An EEG was recorded to quantitate the hypnotic effect, relating the median frequency of the power spectrum to the plasma level by a sigmoid Emax model, including an effect compartment. Pharmacokinetic data were derived from arterial blood samples with use of a three-compartment model.
The total doses needed to reach the defined end points were 71+/-9 mg and 35+/-6 mg for the younger and elderly subjects, respectively (P < .001). Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in both groups (clearance, 399+/-91 and 388+/-97 mL/min; steady-state volume of distribution, 85+/-22 and 104 +/-11 L in young and elderly subjects, respectively). Pharmacodynamic data showed a large difference in half-maximum concentration (EC50; young subjects, 522+/-236 ng/mL; elderly subjects, 223+/-56 ng/mL; P < .05), a steep concentration-response curve, and distinct hysteresis. We found much interindividual variability in the plasma concentrations necessary to achieve the clinical end points, regardless of age.
These results suggest that the lower doses needed to reach sedation in the elderly subjects were attributable to a 50% decrease in EC50, not to changes in pharmacokinetics.
我们以脑电图(EEG)作为催眠镇静效果的衡量指标,研究了咪达唑仑的药理学特性,特别关注年龄因素。
9名年轻男性志愿者(24至28岁)和9名老年男性志愿者(67至81岁)通过计算机控制设备接受咪达唑仑。进行两个输注周期,目标血浆水平呈线性增加(年轻受试者斜率为40 ng/mL/分钟;老年受试者为20 ng/mL/分钟),直至达到确定的终点(EEG中位频率<4 Hz且对听觉刺激无反应)。记录EEG以量化催眠效果,通过包含效应室的S形Emax模型将功率谱的中位频率与血浆水平相关联。药代动力学数据来自动脉血样本,采用三室模型。
年轻和老年受试者达到确定终点所需的总剂量分别为71±9 mg和35±6 mg(P<.001)。两组的药代动力学参数相似(清除率,年轻和老年受试者分别为399±91和388±97 mL/分钟;稳态分布容积分别为85±22和104±11 L)。药效学数据显示半数最大浓度(EC50)有很大差异(年轻受试者为522±236 ng/mL;老年受试者为223±56 ng/mL;P<.05),浓度-反应曲线陡峭,且有明显的滞后现象。我们发现,无论年龄如何,达到临床终点所需的血浆浓度存在很大的个体差异。
这些结果表明,老年受试者达到镇静所需较低剂量归因于EC50降低50%,而非药代动力学的改变。