Platten H P, Schweizer E, Dilger K, Mikus G, Klotz U
Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998 May;63(5):552-60. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(98)90106-0.
To determine whether age-dependent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations account for a more pronounced response to benzodiazepines among elderly patients.
Twelve young patients and 10 elderly patients received an intravenous dose of 0.05 or 0.03 mg/kg midazolan, respectively, before third molar extraction. Postoperative pain was treated with 30 mg dihydrocodeine. Serum concentrations of midazolam and sedative effects were monitored with visual analog scales and choice reaction time measurements for 6 hours. Test values above baseline were integrated, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was performed. Heart rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, and amnesia also were assessed.
There were no significant age-dependent differences in disposition of midazolam between young and elderly patients (apparent volume of distribution, 1.3 +/- 0.2 versus 1.1 +/- 0.4 L/kg; halflife, 3.3 +/- 1.5 hours versus 3.7 +/- 2.2 hours; total body clearance, 451 +/- 186 ml/min versus 343 +/- 137 ml/min). However, higher values of area under the effect curve (AUEC) and AUEC divided by area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) (sensitivity index) were observed among the elderly as follows: AUEC for reaction time (AUECRT) (573 versus 261; p = 0.042), AUEC for visual analog scale (AUECVAS) (37.7 versus 14.4; p = 0.011), AUECRT/AUC (6.3 versus 1.8; p = 0.007), and AUECVAS/AUC (0.40 versus 0.11; p = 0.009) compared with the young group. Likewise, mean concentration at half-maximal effect for sedation was lower (p = 0.025) among older patients (20.5 +/- 2.2 ng/ml) than among younger (29.7 +/- 6.6 ng/ml) patients. Amnesia was observed among 86% of patients and oxygen saturation was always 95% or more of basal value. There were no age-related differences in concentration of dihydrocodeine and its active metabolite dihydromorphine, but dihydromorphone levels were much lower in there intermediate metabolizers (455 to 879 fmol/l) and especially in five poor metabolizers (65 to 498 fmol/L) than among extensive metabolizer of cytochrome p450 2D6 (1604 to 6490 fmol/L).
Elderly patients are more sensitive to the sedative action of midazolam than young patients, and the sensitivity is caused by age-dependent pharmacodynamic alterations. The age-adjusted doses used are both effective (for sedative amnesia) and safe (in terms of arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate, and blood pressure.
确定年龄依赖性的药代动力学和药效学改变是否是老年患者对苯二氮䓬类药物反应更明显的原因。
12名年轻患者和10名老年患者在拔除第三磨牙前分别静脉注射0.05或0.03mg/kg咪达唑仑。术后疼痛用30mg二氢可待因治疗。用视觉模拟量表和选择反应时间测量法监测咪达唑仑的血清浓度和镇静效果6小时。对高于基线的测试值进行积分,并进行药代动力学-药效学分析。还评估了心率、血压、动脉血氧饱和度和遗忘症。
年轻患者和老年患者在咪达唑仑处置方面无显著的年龄依赖性差异(分布容积,1.3±0.2对1.1±0.4L/kg;半衰期,3.3±1.5小时对3.7±2.2小时;全身清除率,451±186ml/min对343±137ml/min)。然而,在老年人中观察到更高的效应曲线下面积(AUEC)值以及AUEC除以血清浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)(敏感性指数),如下所示:反应时间的AUEC(AUECRT)(573对261;p=0.042),视觉模拟量表的AUEC(AUECVAS)(37.7对14.4;p=0.011),AUECRT/AUC(6.3对1.8;p=0.007),以及AUECVAS/AUC(0.40对0.11;p=0.009),与年轻组相比。同样,老年患者(20.5±2.2ng/ml)镇静的半数有效浓度均值低于年轻患者(29.7±6.6ng/ml)(p=0.025)。86%的患者出现遗忘症,且血氧饱和度始终为基础值的95%或更高。二氢可待因及其活性代谢物二氢吗啡的浓度无年龄相关差异,但在中间代谢者(455至879fmol/l)中,尤其是在5名慢代谢者(65至498fmol/L)中,二氢吗啡水平远低于细胞色素p450 2D6的快代谢者(1604至6490fmol/L)。
老年患者对咪达唑仑的镇静作用比年轻患者更敏感,且这种敏感性是由年龄依赖性的药效学改变引起的。所使用的年龄调整剂量既有效(用于镇静遗忘)又安全(就动脉血氧饱和度、心率和血压而言)。