Burman M L, Taplin S H, Herta D F, Elmore J G
Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System (Seattle Division), Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, and University of Washington, 98108, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jul 6;131(1):1-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-1-199907060-00002.
Despite the mortality benefits of breast cancer screening, not all women receive regular mammography. Such factors as age, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation have been associated with greater use of screening. However, we do not know whether having an abnormal mammogram affects future screening.
To examine the effect of a false-positive mammogram on adherence to the next recommended screening mammogram.
Prospective cohort study.
The breast cancer screening program at Group Health Cooperative, a health maintenance organization in Washington state.
5059 women 40 years of age or older with no history of breast cancer or breast surgery who had false-positive (n = 813) or true-negative (n = 4246) index screening mammograms between 1 August 1990 and 31 July 1992.
Screening rates and odds ratios for recommended interval screening up to 42 months after the index mammogram.
After adjustment for differences in age; previous use of mammography; family history of breast cancer; exogenous hormone use; and age at menarche, first childbirth, and menopause, women with false-positive index mammograms were more likely than those with true-negative index mammograms to obtain their next recommended screening mammogram (odds ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.45]). The relation between a false-positive mammogram and the likelihood of adherence to screening in the next recommended interval was strongest among women who had not previously undergone mammography (odds ratio, 1.66 [CI, 1.26 to 2.17]).
Having a false-positive mammogram did not adversely affect screening behavior in the next recommended interval. Women with false-positive mammograms, especially those without previous mammography, were more likely to return for the next scheduled screening.
尽管乳腺癌筛查能降低死亡率,但并非所有女性都定期进行乳房X光检查。年龄、社会经济地位和医生建议等因素与更多地进行筛查有关。然而,我们尚不清楚乳房X光检查结果异常是否会影响未来的筛查。
研究乳房X光检查假阳性对下次推荐的筛查性乳房X光检查依从性的影响。
前瞻性队列研究。
华盛顿州健康维护组织Group Health Cooperative的乳腺癌筛查项目。
1990年8月1日至1992年7月31日期间,5059名40岁及以上、无乳腺癌或乳房手术史、乳房X光检查初筛结果为假阳性(n = 813)或真阴性(n = 4246)的女性。
初筛乳房X光检查后长达42个月的推荐间隔筛查率和比值比。
在对年龄差异、既往乳房X光检查使用情况、乳腺癌家族史、外源性激素使用情况以及初潮年龄、首次生育年龄和绝经年龄进行调整后,乳房X光检查初筛结果为假阳性的女性比结果为真阴性的女性更有可能进行下次推荐的筛查性乳房X光检查(比值比,1.21 [95%可信区间,1.01至1.45])。乳房X光检查假阳性与下次推荐间隔内筛查依从性可能性之间的关系在既往未进行过乳房X光检查的女性中最为明显(比值比,1.66 [可信区间,1.26至2.17])。
乳房X光检查假阳性不会对下次推荐间隔内的筛查行为产生不利影响。乳房X光检查结果为假阳性的女性,尤其是那些既往未进行过乳房X光检查的女性,更有可能返回进行下次预定筛查。