Suppr超能文献

乳腺钼靶检查假阳性后患者担忧增加:临床医生记录及后续门诊就诊情况

Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits.

作者信息

Barton M B, Moore S, Polk S, Shtatland E, Elmore J G, Fletcher S W

机构信息

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Mar;16(3):150-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00329.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To measure how often a breast-related concern was documented in medical records after screening mammography according to the mammogram result (normal, or true-negative vs false-positive) and to measure changes in health care utilization in the year after the mammogram.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Large health maintenance organization in New England.

PATIENTS

Group of 496 women with false-positive screening mammograms and a comparison group of 496 women with normal screening mammograms, matched for location and year of mammogram.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

  1. Documentation in clinicians' notes of patient concern about the breast and 2) ambulatory health care utilization, both breast-related and non-breast-related, in the year after the mammogram. Fifty (10%) of 496 women with false-positive mammograms had documentation of breast-related concern during the 12 months after the mammogram, compared to 1 (0.2%) woman with a normal mammogram (P =.001). Documented concern increased with the intensity of recommended follow-up (P =.009). Subsequent ambulatory visits, not related to the screening mammogram, increased in the year after the mammogram among women with false-positive mammograms, both in terms of breast-related visits (incidence ratio, 3.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69 to 5.93) and non-breast-related visits (incidence ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians document concern about breast cancer in 10% of women who have false-positive mammograms, and subsequent use of health care services are increased among women with false-positive mammogram results.

摘要

目的

根据乳房X光检查结果(正常,即真阴性与假阳性),衡量在乳房X光筛查后医疗记录中记录与乳房相关问题的频率,并衡量乳房X光检查后一年内医疗保健利用率的变化。

设计

队列研究。

地点

新英格兰的大型健康维护组织。

患者

496名乳房X光筛查结果为假阳性的女性群体,以及496名乳房X光筛查结果正常的女性作为对照组,两组在乳房X光检查的地点和年份上进行匹配。

测量与主要结果

1)临床医生记录中患者对乳房问题的关注情况,以及2)乳房X光检查后一年内与乳房相关和非乳房相关的门诊医疗保健利用率。496名乳房X光筛查结果为假阳性的女性中,有50名(10%)在乳房X光检查后的12个月内有与乳房相关问题的记录,而乳房X光检查结果正常的女性中只有1名(0.2%)有相关记录(P = 0.001)。记录的关注度随着推荐随访强度的增加而增加(P = 0.009)。在乳房X光检查后一年内,乳房X光筛查结果为假阳性的女性中,与筛查乳房X光检查无关的后续门诊就诊次数增加,包括与乳房相关的就诊(发病率比,3.07;95%置信区间[CI],1.69至5.93)和非乳房相关的就诊(发病率比,1.14;95%CI,1.03至1.25)。

结论

临床医生在10%乳房X光筛查结果为假阳性的女性中记录了对乳腺癌的关注,并且乳房X光筛查结果为假阳性的女性后续医疗服务的使用有所增加。

相似文献

8
Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms.预测乳腺钼靶检查假阳性的累积风险。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Oct 18;92(20):1657-66. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.20.1657.
9
Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.假阳性筛查性乳房 X 光检查的后果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):954-61. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.981.

引用本文的文献

6
Subjective Versus Quantitative Methods of Assessing Breast Density.评估乳腺密度的主观方法与定量方法
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 May 21;10(5):331. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10050331.

本文引用的文献

2
Genetic counselling for hereditary breast cancer.遗传性乳腺癌的遗传咨询
Lancet. 1999 Jun 26;353(9171):2176-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)90078-8.
4
Diagnostic testing following screening mammography in the elderly.老年人乳腺钼靶筛查后的诊断性检测
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Sep 16;90(18):1389-92. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.18.1389.
5
False positive rate of screening mammography.
N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 20;339(8):561-2; author reply 563.
10
Choosing among generalized linear models applied to medical data.在应用于医学数据的广义线性模型中进行选择。
Stat Med. 1998 Jan 15;17(1):59-68. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<59::aid-sim733>3.0.co;2-7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验