Laccourreye O
Service d'Oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, Hôpital Laennec, AP-HP, Université Paris V.
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 1999 Jun;116(3):115-25.
To evaluate the quality and evolution of the medical writing of the scientific reports published by the Annales d'Otolaryngologie et de Chirurgie Cervico-faciale.
A comparative study of quantitative and qualitative data regarding the medical writting of 98 scientific reports published in 1977, 1987, and 1997 in the Annales d'Otolaryngologie et de Chirurgie Cervico-faciale.
Various significant statistical results documented an increase within the quality of the medical writing of the scientific reports published. However, various probllems regarding the medical writing of the chapters "Title", "Summary", or "Discussion", the type of study performed, the use of biostatistics, the references, and the style still exist.
Based upon the data collected, the author supports the actual policy of the editorial board regarding the increased severity concerning the medical writing of the scientific reports submitted to the Annales d'Otolaryngologie et de Chirurgie Cervico-faciale. Various propositions are also performed to increase the quality of the medical writting and the diffusion of the scientific reports published by the Annales d'Otolaryngologie et de Chirurgie Cervico-faciale.
评估《耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学年鉴》发表的科学报告的医学写作质量及演变情况。
对1977年、1987年和1997年发表在《耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学年鉴》上的98篇科学报告的医学写作的定量和定性数据进行比较研究。
各种显著的统计结果表明所发表科学报告的医学写作质量有所提高。然而，在“标题”“摘要”或“讨论”章节的医学写作、所进行研究的类型、生物统计学的使用、参考文献以及风格方面仍存在各种问题。
基于所收集的数据，作者支持编辑委员会目前对于提交给《耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学年鉴》的科学报告的医学写作提高严格程度的政策。还提出了各种建议以提高《耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学年鉴》发表的科学报告的医学写作质量和传播范围。
