Endoh Y, Kasanuki H, Ohnishi S, Uno M
Department of Cardiology, Saisei-kai Kurihashi Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Jpn Circ J. 1999 Jun;63(6):467-70. doi: 10.1253/jcj.63.467.
The present study investigated whether corrected QT (QTc) dispersion could play a role as a marker of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction (MI). The study included 76 males and 24 females with a mean age of 60+/-11 years. Standard 12-lead ECGs were recorded during the recovery phase (15+/-9 days) after the onset of MI. The QTc was calculated according to Bazett's formula and QTc dispersion was calculated as the difference between the maximum and minimum QTc intervals. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 21 patients (group A) had a QTc dispersion of > or =80ms, and the other 79 patients (group B) had a QTc dispersion of <80ms in the recovery stage (15+/-9 days). Clinical, angiographical, and Holter monitoring data, and prognosis (mean follow-up period 29+/-18 months) were compared between these 2 groups. The frequencies of early coronary reperfusion and recanalization of infarct-related vessels during the recovery phase were significantly higher in group B than group A. The left ventricular ejection fraction was also higher in group B than group A (51+/-12 vs 43+/-12%, p=0.0029). There were no significant differences in the number of premature ventricular contractions, the percentage of patients with repetitive ventricular arrhythmias, or in the frequency of sudden cardiac death during the follow-up period between the 2 groups. In summary, QTc dispersion in the recovery stage is not a useful marker for ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death after acute MI, although increased QTc dispersion may correlate with an ineffective early coronary reperfusion and with the degree of depressed left ventricular function.
本研究调查了校正QT(QTc)离散度是否可作为急性心肌梗死(MI)后室性心律失常和心源性猝死的标志物。该研究纳入了76名男性和24名女性,平均年龄为60±11岁。在MI发作后的恢复阶段(15±9天)记录标准12导联心电图。根据Bazett公式计算QTc,并将QTc离散度计算为最大和最小QTc间期之间的差值。患者分为两组:21例患者(A组)在恢复阶段(15±9天)的QTc离散度≥80ms,另外79例患者(B组)的QTc离散度<80ms。比较了这两组患者的临床、血管造影和动态心电图监测数据以及预后(平均随访期29±18个月)。B组在恢复阶段早期冠状动脉再灌注和梗死相关血管再通的频率显著高于A组。B组的左心室射血分数也高于A组(51±12%对43±12%,p = 0.0029)。两组在随访期间室性早搏数量、重复性室性心律失常患者百分比或心源性猝死频率方面无显著差异。总之,急性MI后恢复阶段的QTc离散度不是室性心律失常或心源性猝死的有用标志物,尽管QTc离散度增加可能与早期冠状动脉再灌注无效和左心室功能降低程度相关。