Suppr超能文献

[有和无隐形眼镜病史患者的细菌性角膜炎]

[Bacterial keratitis in patients with and without contact lens anamnesis].

作者信息

Fröhlich S J, de Kaspar H M, Grasbon T, Möhring C, Klauss V, Kampik A

机构信息

Augenklinik der LMU München.

出版信息

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1999 Apr;214(4):211-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1034778.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study shows differences between contact lens wearers and patients without history of contact lenses regarding the spectrum of etiological agents in bacterial keratitis. Based on microbiological analysis, there are given recommendations for an optimal initial antibiotic treatment in both groups.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 1989 to 1997 smears, scrapings and corneal biopsies were taken from 218 patients with bacterial keratitis. The causing pathogens were isolated on directly inoculated culture media and identified by staining and microscopy. The resistance pattern of a total of 275 germs was analysed for different antibiotics.

RESULTS

The most frequently isolated germs were Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp., Propionibacterium acnes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Whereas sensitive gram-positive germs were predominating in contact lens wearers as well as in non-contact lens wearers, multiresistant gram-negative germs could nearly exclusively be isolated from contact lens wearers. Frequently administered antibiotics like aminoglycosides and quinolones are effective in infections caused by Staphylococcus spp., but increasing resistance could be seen to Streptococcus spp. In this case, erythromycin is very sensitive. Gram-negative germs like Pseudomonas aeruginosa are sensitive to quinolones and some aminoglycosides (e.g. tobramycin).

CONCLUSION

In contact lens wearers, more aggressive germs have to be considered than in non-contact lens wearers. In such cases, frequently administered antibiotics like amino-glycosides are not effective. To cover problematic gram-negative germs we recommend the application of quinolones alternating with erythromycin. The latter one is more effective than quinolones and aminoglycosides in case of Streptococcus spp. co-involvement.

摘要

背景

该研究显示,在细菌性角膜炎的病原体谱方面,隐形眼镜佩戴者与无隐形眼镜佩戴史的患者之间存在差异。基于微生物学分析,针对两组患者给出了最佳初始抗生素治疗的建议。

材料与方法

1989年至1997年,从218例细菌性角膜炎患者身上采集涂片、刮片和角膜活检样本。将致病病原体接种于直接接种的培养基上进行分离,并通过染色和显微镜检查进行鉴定。分析了总共275株细菌对不同抗生素的耐药模式。

结果

最常分离出的细菌是表皮葡萄球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、链球菌属、痤疮丙酸杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌。在隐形眼镜佩戴者和非隐形眼镜佩戴者中,敏感革兰氏阳性菌均占主导地位,但多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌几乎仅从隐形眼镜佩戴者中分离得到。常用抗生素如氨基糖苷类和喹诺酮类对葡萄球菌属引起的感染有效,但对链球菌属的耐药性呈上升趋势。在这种情况下,红霉素非常敏感。革兰氏阴性菌如铜绿假单胞菌对喹诺酮类和一些氨基糖苷类(如妥布霉素)敏感。

结论

与非隐形眼镜佩戴者相比,隐形眼镜佩戴者需要考虑更具侵袭性的细菌。在这种情况下,常用抗生素如氨基糖苷类无效。为覆盖有问题的革兰氏阴性菌,我们建议交替使用喹诺酮类和红霉素。在链球菌属共同感染的情况下,后者比喹诺酮类和氨基糖苷类更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验