Suppr超能文献

生存理由与死亡理由:审视自杀的内心争论

Reasons for living versus reasons for dying: examining the internal debate of suicide.

作者信息

Jobes D A, Mann R E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA.

出版信息

Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1999 Summer;29(2):97-104.

Abstract

The Reasons for Living vs. Reasons for Dying (RFL/RFD) Assessment was used to obtain suicidal outpatients' top five reasons for living and for dying, respectively. Forty-nine suicidal university counseling center patients provided 173 RFL and 145 RFD responses. These responses were organized into eight RFL coding categories and nine RFD coding categories. Two coders trained in the RFL/RFD coding system showed high levels of interrater reliability (KRFL = .81; KRFD = .80). Chi-square results for RFL and RFD coding categories showed that the coding categories were not equally salient to these suicidal patients.

摘要

采用生存理由与死亡理由(RFL/RFD)评估法分别获取有自杀倾向的门诊患者最重要的五项生存理由和死亡理由。49名有自杀倾向的大学咨询中心患者给出了173条生存理由回应和145条死亡理由回应。这些回应被归为8个生存理由编码类别和9个死亡理由编码类别。两名接受过RFL/RFD编码系统培训的编码员表现出了较高的评分者间信度(KRFL = 0.81;KRFD = 0.80)。生存理由和死亡理由编码类别的卡方检验结果表明,这些编码类别对这些有自杀倾向的患者而言并非同等显著。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验