Suppr超能文献

[可信度专家评估标准]

[Standards for expert assessment of credibility].

作者信息

Martinius J

机构信息

Institut und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Klinikum Innenstadt.

出版信息

Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 1999 May;27(2):121-4. doi: 10.1024//1422-4917.27.2.121.

Abstract

Expert judgment of the credibility of children's statements in cases of abuse is frequently requested of specialists in psychology and child and adolescent psychiatry, the latter being mandatory if psychopathology is present in the child. Assessment and judgment must meet standards of quality. Important innovations include a systematic procedure, avoidance of suggestive techniques for exploration and the application of a so-called criteria-based analysis of the child's statement. To exemplify the standards a case of an allegation of false expert judgment is presented.

摘要

在虐待案件中,经常会要求心理学以及儿童与青少年精神病学领域的专家对儿童陈述的可信度做出专业判断。如果儿童存在精神病理学问题,后者(儿童与青少年精神病学专家)的判断则是必需的。评估和判断必须符合质量标准。重要的创新措施包括采用系统程序、避免使用诱导性询问技巧以及应用所谓基于标准的儿童陈述分析方法。为了举例说明这些标准,本文呈现了一个关于专家判断失误指控的案例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验