Martinius J
Institut und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Klinikum Innenstadt.
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 1999 May;27(2):121-4. doi: 10.1024//1422-4917.27.2.121.
Expert judgment of the credibility of children's statements in cases of abuse is frequently requested of specialists in psychology and child and adolescent psychiatry, the latter being mandatory if psychopathology is present in the child. Assessment and judgment must meet standards of quality. Important innovations include a systematic procedure, avoidance of suggestive techniques for exploration and the application of a so-called criteria-based analysis of the child's statement. To exemplify the standards a case of an allegation of false expert judgment is presented.
在虐待案件中,经常会要求心理学以及儿童与青少年精神病学领域的专家对儿童陈述的可信度做出专业判断。如果儿童存在精神病理学问题,后者(儿童与青少年精神病学专家)的判断则是必需的。评估和判断必须符合质量标准。重要的创新措施包括采用系统程序、避免使用诱导性询问技巧以及应用所谓基于标准的儿童陈述分析方法。为了举例说明这些标准,本文呈现了一个关于专家判断失误指控的案例。