Voit C, Schoengen A, Schwürzer M, Weber L, Mayer T, Proebstle T M
Department of Dermatology, University of Ulm, Germany.
Br J Cancer. 1999 Jul;80(10):1672-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690580.
Physical examination and ultrasound B-scan screening are important follow-up procedures in melanoma patients with regional disease. However, they do not allow definite diagnosis of suspicious lesions. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) enhances the diagnostic accuracy in such patients but, unfortunately, reaches its technical limits, particularly when very small or necrotic lesions are examined. We therefore tested whether tyrosinase reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of fine-needle aspirates (FNA-PCR) could help to increase diagnostic sensitivity. With clinical follow-up in 69 melanoma patients 81 regional lymph nodes were detected by ultrasound B-scan examination, nine of whom appeared to be palpable. Technically, FNAC was successful in all 81 lymph nodes, while FNA-PCR failed to obtain RNA at detectable levels in two lymph nodes of two patients. Of 79 lesions which have been completely evaluated by B-scan, FNAC and FNA-PCR, 44 proved to be melanoma metastases by histopathology, while the remaining 35 lesions were finally classified as non-specific lymph nodes. Of the 44 melanoma metastases 80% (n = 35) have been detected by B-scan, 90% (n = 39) by FNAC and 100% (n = 44) by FNA-PCR (P < 0.05 vs FNAC, P < 0.005 vs B-scan). In the subclass of lesions with diameters below 10 mm the sensitivities were 72% (n = 13), 78% (n = 14) and 100% (n = 18) respectively. In 35 regional lymph nodes classified as benign lesions, FNAC was always negative while FNA-PCR produced one positive result. Neither of these methods did produce false positive results in 15 control lymph nodes of non-melanoma patients. We conclude, that FNA-PCR might have superior sensitivity as compared to FNAC or ultrasound B-scan, particularly in melanoma lesions with diameters below 10 mm.
体格检查和超声B超筛查是黑色素瘤区域病变患者重要的后续检查程序。然而,它们无法对可疑病变做出明确诊断。细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)提高了此类患者的诊断准确性,但遗憾的是,它有技术局限性,尤其是在检查非常小的或坏死性病变时。因此,我们测试了细针穿刺抽吸物的酪氨酸酶逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR,即FNA-PCR)是否有助于提高诊断敏感性。对69例黑色素瘤患者进行临床随访,通过超声B超检查发现81个区域淋巴结,其中9个可触及。从技术角度来看,FNAC在所有81个淋巴结中均成功,而FNA-PCR在两名患者的两个淋巴结中未能获得可检测水平的RNA。在79个经B超、FNAC和FNA-PCR全面评估的病变中,44个经组织病理学证实为黑色素瘤转移灶,其余35个病变最终归类为非特异性淋巴结。在44个黑色素瘤转移灶中,80%(n = 35)通过B超检测到,90%(n = 39)通过FNAC检测到,100%(n = 44)通过FNA-PCR检测到(与FNAC相比,P < 0.05;与B超相比,P < 0.005)。在直径小于10 mm的病变亚组中,敏感性分别为72%(n = 13)、78%(n = 14)和100%(n = 18)。在35个归类为良性病变的区域淋巴结中,FNAC始终为阴性,而FNA-PCR产生了一个阳性结果。在非黑色素瘤患者的15个对照淋巴结中,这两种方法均未产生假阳性结果。我们得出结论,与FNAC或超声B超相比,FNA-PCR可能具有更高的敏感性,尤其是在直径小于10 mm的黑色素瘤病变中。