Mead G E, Shingler H, Farrell A, O'Neill P A, McCollum C N
Department of Geriatric Medicine, South Manchester University NHS Trust, West Didsbury, UK.
Age Ageing. 1998 Nov;27(6):677-82. doi: 10.1093/ageing/27.6.677.
the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) devised a simple clinical classification for acute stroke which predicted mortality, functional recovery and patterns of recurrent stroke. We aimed to determine whether this could predict the presence of carotid disease and be used to select which patients with acute stroke should be referred for carotid imaging with a view to subsequent carotid endarterectomy.
we assessed patients with acute stroke admitted to seven hospitals over a 10-month period. Patients were classified according to the OCSP system and their carotid arteries investigated using portable continuous wave Doppler. Those with abnormal portable assessments had colour duplex Doppler imaging.
of 305 patients with proven or probable cerebral infarction, severe (70-99%) ipsilateral carotid stenosis was found in 16 (16%) of the 101 with partial anterior circulation infarct (PACI), four (4%) of the 100 with total anterior circulation infarct (TACI), none of the 80 with lacunar infarct (LACI) and one (4%) of the 24 with posterior circulation infarct (POCI). Complete ipsilateral carotid occlusion was found in 25 (25%) of the TACI group, 11 (11%) of the PACI group, three (4%) of the LACI group and none of the POCI group. Severe carotid stenosis or occlusion was more common in the ipsilateral than the contralateral carotid artery for the TACI and PACI groups (chi2 P< 0.05), but there was no difference between ipsilateral and contralateral carotid disease in the LACI and POCI groups. If the OCSP classification is used to detect patients with 70-99% carotid stenosis, then the sensitivity is 76% and specificity is 70%.
these findings suggest that ipsilateral carotid disease is an important cause of stroke for those with anterior circulation infarcts but not for those with LACI or POCI. Subjects with PACI should be referred for early carotid imaging to identify those with severe disease who may be suitable for elective carotid surgery.
牛津郡社区卒中项目(OCSP)设计了一种简单的急性卒中临床分类方法,该方法可预测死亡率、功能恢复情况及复发性卒中的模式。我们旨在确定该方法能否预测颈动脉疾病的存在,并用于选择哪些急性卒中患者应接受颈动脉成像检查,以便后续进行颈动脉内膜切除术。
我们对10个月内入住7家医院的急性卒中患者进行了评估。根据OCSP系统对患者进行分类,并使用便携式连续波多普勒对其颈动脉进行检查。便携式评估异常的患者接受彩色双功多普勒成像检查。
在305例经证实或可能患有脑梗死的患者中,101例部分前循环梗死(PACI)患者中有16例(16%)发现同侧颈动脉严重狭窄(70 - 99%),100例完全前循环梗死(TACI)患者中有4例(4%),80例腔隙性梗死(LACI)患者中未发现,24例后循环梗死(POCI)患者中有1例(4%)。在TACI组中,25例(25%)发现同侧颈动脉完全闭塞,PACI组中11例(11%),LACI组中3例(4%),POCI组中未发现。对于TACI组和PACI组,严重颈动脉狭窄或闭塞在同侧颈动脉比在对侧颈动脉更常见(卡方检验P < 0.05),但LACI组和POCI组同侧和对侧颈动脉疾病之间无差异。如果使用OCSP分类来检测70 - 99%颈动脉狭窄的患者,其敏感性为76%,特异性为70%。
这些发现表明,同侧颈动脉疾病是前循环梗死患者卒中的重要原因,但不是LACI或POCI患者的重要原因。PACI患者应尽早接受颈动脉成像检查,以识别那些可能适合择期颈动脉手术的严重疾病患者。