Labrie F, Labrie C, Bélanger A, Simard J, Gauthier S, Luu-The V, Mérand Y, Giguere V, Candas B, Luo S, Martel C, Singh S M, Fournier M, Coquet A, Richard V, Charbonneau R, Charpenet G, Tremblay A, Tremblay G, Cusan L, Veilleux R
Oncology and Molecular Endocrinology Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Department of Medicine, Laval University, Canada.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1999 Apr-Jun;69(1-6):51-84. doi: 10.1016/s0960-0760(99)00065-5.
Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women while it is the second cause of cancer death. Estrogens are well recognized to play the predominant role in breast cancer development and growth and much efforts have been devoted to the blockade of estrogen formation and action. The most widely used therapy of breast cancer which has shown benefits at all stages of the disease is the use of the antiestrogen Tamoxifen. This compound, however, possesses mixed agonist and antagonist activity and major efforts have been devoted to the development of compounds having pure antiestrogenic activity in the mammary gland and endometrium. Such a compound would avoid the problem of stimulation of the endometrium and the risk of endometrial carcinoma. We have thus synthesized an orally active non-steroidal antiestrogen, EM-652 (SCH 57068) and the prodrug EM-800 (SCH57050) which are the most potent of the known antiestrogens. EM-652 is the compound having the highest affinity for the estrogen receptor, including estradiol. It has higher affinity for the ER than ICI 182780, hydroxytamoxifen, raloxifene, droloxifene and hydroxytoremifene. EM-652 has the most potent inhibitory activity on both ER alpha and ER beta compared to any of the other antiestrogens tested. An important aspect of EM-652 is that it inhibits both the AF1 and AF2 functions of both ER alpha and ER beta while the inhibitory action of hydroxytamoxifen is limited to AF2, the ligand-dependent function of the estrogen receptors. AF1 activity is constitutive, ligand-independent and is responsible for mediation of the activity of growth factors and of the ras oncogene and MAP-kinase pathway. EM-652 inhibits Ras-induced transcriptional activity of ER alpha and ER beta and blocks SRC-1-stimulated activity of the two receptors. EM-652 was also found to block the recruitment of SRC-1 at AF1 of ER beta, this ligand-independent activation of AF1 being closely related to phosphorylation of the steroid receptors by protein kinase. Most importantly, the antiestrogen hydroxytamoxifen has no inhibitory effect on the SRC-1-induced ER beta activity while the pure antiestrogen EM-652 completely abolishes this effect, thus strengthening the need to use pure antiestrogens in breast cancer therapy in order to control all known aspects of ER-regulated gene expression. In fact, the absence of blockade of AF2 by hydroxytamoxifen could explain why the benefits of tamoxifen observed up to 5 years become negative at longer time intervals and why resistance develops to tamoxifen. EM-800, the prodrug of EM-652, has been shown to prevent the development of dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary carcinoma in the rat, a well-recognized model of human breast cancer. It is of interest that the addition of dehydroepiandrosterone, a precursor of androgens, to EM-800, led to complete inhibition of tumor development in this model. Not only the development, but also the growth of established DMBA-induced mammary carcinoma was inhibited by treatment with EM-800. An inhibitory effect was also observed when medroxyprogesterone was added to treatment with EM-800. Uterine size was reduced to castration levels in the groups of animals treated with EM-800. An almost complete disappearance of estrogen receptors was observed in the uterus, vaginum and tumors in nude mice treated with EM-800. EM-652 was the most potent antiestrogen to inhibit the growth of human breast cancer ZR-75-1, MCF-7 and T-47D cells in vitro when compared with ICI 182780, ICI 164384, hydroxytamoxifen, and droloxifene. Moreover, EM-652 and EM-800 have no stimulatory effect on the basal levels of cell proliferation in the absence of E2 while hydroxytamoxifen and droloxifene had a stimulatory effect on the basal growth of T-47D and ZR-75-1 cells. EM-652 was also the most potent inhibitor of the percentage of cycling cancer cells. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
乳腺癌是女性中最常见的癌症,同时也是癌症死亡的第二大原因。雌激素在乳腺癌的发生和发展中起着主要作用,这一点已得到广泛认可,并且人们已投入大量精力来阻断雌激素的形成和作用。在乳腺癌的所有阶段均显示出益处的最广泛使用的治疗方法是使用抗雌激素药物他莫昔芬。然而,这种化合物具有混合的激动剂和拮抗剂活性,人们已投入大量精力来开发在乳腺和子宫内膜中具有纯抗雌激素活性的化合物。这样的化合物将避免刺激子宫内膜的问题以及子宫内膜癌的风险。因此,我们合成了一种口服活性非甾体抗雌激素EM - 652(SCH 57068)及其前体药物EM - 800(SCH57050),它们是已知抗雌激素中最有效的。EM - 652是对雌激素受体(包括雌二醇)具有最高亲和力的化合物。它对雌激素受体的亲和力高于ICI 182780、羟基他莫昔芬、雷洛昔芬、屈洛昔芬和羟基托瑞米芬。与任何其他测试的抗雌激素相比,EM - 652对雌激素受体α和β均具有最有效的抑制活性。EM - 652的一个重要方面是它抑制雌激素受体α和β的AF1和AF2功能,而羟基他莫昔芬的抑制作用仅限于AF2,即雌激素受体的配体依赖性功能。AF1活性是组成性的、不依赖配体的,并且负责介导生长因子、ras癌基因和MAP激酶途径的活性。EM - 652抑制Ras诱导的雌激素受体α和β的转录活性,并阻断SRC - 1刺激的这两种受体的活性。还发现EM - 652可阻断SRC - 1在雌激素受体β的AF1处的募集,这种AF1的不依赖配体的激活与蛋白激酶对类固醇受体的磷酸化密切相关。最重要的是,抗雌激素药物羟基他莫昔芬对SRC - 1诱导的雌激素受体β活性没有抑制作用,而纯抗雌激素EM - 652完全消除了这种作用,因此加强了在乳腺癌治疗中使用纯抗雌激素以控制雌激素受体调节的基因表达的所有已知方面的必要性。事实上,羟基他莫昔芬对AF2缺乏阻断作用可以解释为什么他莫昔芬在长达5年观察到的益处随着时间间隔延长而变为负面,以及为什么会对他莫昔芬产生耐药性。EM - 652的前体药物EM - 800已被证明可预防二甲基苯并(a)蒽(DMBA)诱导的大鼠乳腺癌的发生,这是一种公认的人类乳腺癌模型。有趣的是,将雄激素的前体脱氢表雄酮添加到EM - 800中,可导致该模型中肿瘤的发生完全受到抑制。不仅肿瘤的发生,而且已建立的DMBA诱导的乳腺癌的生长也受到EM - 800治疗的抑制。当将甲羟孕酮添加到EM - 800治疗中时也观察到了抑制作用。在用EM - 800治疗的动物组中,子宫大小减小到去势水平。在用EM - 800治疗的裸鼠的子宫、阴道和肿瘤中观察到雌激素受体几乎完全消失。与ICI 182780、ICI 164384、羟基他莫昔芬和屈洛昔芬相比,EM - 652是体外抑制人乳腺癌ZR - 75 - 1、MCF - 7和T - 47D细胞生长最有效的抗雌激素。此外,在没有E2的情况下,EM - 652和EM - 800对细胞增殖的基础水平没有刺激作用,而羟基他莫昔芬和屈洛昔芬对T - 47D和ZR - 75 - 1细胞的基础生长有刺激作用。EM - 652也是循环癌细胞百分比的最有效抑制剂。(摘要截断)