Zannad F, Boivin J M
Centre d'investigation clinique, INSERM-CHU, Nancy, France.
J Hypertens. 1999 Jul;17(7):1023-32. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199917070-00020.
To measure the time effect profiles of a once daily administered combination tablet felodipine-metoprolol 5/50 mg (Logimax, Astra) and amlodipine 5 mg (Norvasc, Pfizer) on blood pressure and heart rate using 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Randomized multicentre parallel-group study with a single-blind placebo run-in period of 4 weeks duration and a 6-week double-blind active treatment period.
Out of 245 randomized outpatients (90 men, 155 women) with uncomplicated mild-to-moderate primary hypertension and mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95-115 mmHg inclusive, 212 (102 on felodipine-metoprolol, 110 on amlodipine) were eligible for analysis. 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed at the end of the placebo run-in (baseline) and after 6 weeks active treatment (posttreatment).
Both felodipine-metoprolol and amlodipine induced smooth and consistent reduction in DBP and systolic blood pressure throughout the 24-h period, hence not altering the diurnal rhythm. However, felodipine-metoprolol reduced all average blood pressures (24-h, day- and night-time) more than amlodipine (for 24-h average blood pressure 14.4/9.5 mmHg and 8.9/5.5 mmHg, respectively). Medians of individual diastolic trough-to-peak (T/P) ratios were similar for felodipine-metoprolol and amlodipine (54 and 50%, respectively), while for the systolic T/P ratios, the corresponding values were 74 and 35%, repectively; no significant difference between treatments was seen. As distinguished from amlodipine, both heart rate and rate pressure product were markedly decreased on felodipine-metoprolol throughout the 24-h period and even during the early morning hours. In general, both treatments were well tolerated.
Both felodipine-metoprolol and amlodipine achieved optimal control of blood pressure during the inter-dosing interval in line with their pharmokinetic profiles. The vasodilatory adverse events were slightly more reported with felodipine-metoprolol combination, but due to more pronounced lowering of the average blood pressures and the potent additional effect on heart rate and rate pressure product, the efficacy/tolerability balance seems to be equal to or better than that obtained with monotherapy such as amlodipine.
采用24小时动态血压监测,测量每日一次服用的非洛地平-美托洛尔复方片剂5/50毫克(洛吉马克斯,阿斯特拉公司)和氨氯地平5毫克(络活喜,辉瑞公司)对血压和心率的时间效应曲线。
随机多中心平行组研究,有为期4周的单盲安慰剂导入期和为期6周的双盲活性治疗期。
在245例随机分组的门诊患者(90例男性,155例女性)中,他们患有无并发症的轻度至中度原发性高血压,平均坐位舒张压(DBP)在95至115毫米汞柱之间(含95和115毫米汞柱),212例(102例服用非洛地平-美托洛尔,110例服用氨氯地平)符合分析条件。在安慰剂导入期结束时(基线)和6周活性治疗后(治疗后)进行24小时动态血压监测。
非洛地平-美托洛尔和氨氯地平在整个24小时期间均使舒张压和收缩压平稳且持续降低,因此未改变昼夜节律。然而,非洛地平-美托洛尔降低所有平均血压(24小时、日间和夜间)的幅度大于氨氯地平(24小时平均血压分别降低14.4/9.5毫米汞柱和8.9/5.5毫米汞柱)。非洛地平-美托洛尔和氨氯地平的个体舒张压谷峰(T/P)比值中位数相似(分别为54%和50%),而收缩压T/P比值的相应值分别为74%和35%;各治疗组之间未见显著差异。与氨氯地平不同,非洛地平-美托洛尔在整个24小时期间甚至在清晨时段,心率和率压乘积均显著降低。总体而言,两种治疗的耐受性均良好。
非洛地平-美托洛尔和氨氯地平在给药间隔期间均根据其药代动力学特征实现了对血压的最佳控制。非洛地平-美托洛尔复方制剂报告的血管舒张不良事件略多,但由于其平均血压降低更为显著,且对心率和率压乘积有显著的附加作用,其疗效/耐受性平衡似乎等同于或优于氨氯地平单药治疗。