McLay J S, MacDonald T M, Hosie J, Elliott H L
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Buildings, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Nov;56(8):529-35. doi: 10.1007/s002280000198.
The aims of this study were to study the efficacy and tolerability of felodipine extended release (ER) 5 mg and metoprolol controlled release (CR/ZOC) 50 mg given as a fixed combination (Logimax) or as a free combination in elderly (age greater than 60 years) hypertensive patients, using ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. A secondary aim was to relate the efficacy of the free and fixed combinations with pharmacokinetic profiles.
This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised three-way crossover multi-centre study. BP was measured for 26 h using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), which was performed on the last day of the three treatment phases.
Mean sitting BPs, measured during the trough period with ABPM, were significantly lower with both the free and fixed combinations of metoprolol and felodipine than placebo (141/83 mmHg free, 140/83 mmHg fixed, 156/93 mmHg placebo). The mean BPs measured over 24 h using ABPM were 143/82 mmHg, 140/82 mmHg and 158/93 mmHg for the free, fixed and placebo treatment arms, respectively. The trough-to-peak ratios (T:P) were 75% and 79% for the systolic BP and 70% and 70% for the diastolic BP for the free and fixed combinations, respectively. Pharmacokinetic evaluation revealed identical plasma concentration-time curves for felodipine given as the free or fixed combination. Comparison of the plasma concentration-time curves for metoprolol revealed a delay in the release rate from the fixed combination formulation. No significant differences in BP control between the active treatments were noted during this period. Of 26 patients entered into the study, 3 withdrew during active phase for non-drug-related reasons. No patient withdrew from active treatment due to treatment-related adverse events. The frequency of adverse event reporting for the fixed combination of felodipine and metoprolol was similar to that for placebo (60% and 58%, respectively).
The results suggest that once-daily dosing with either the free or fixed combination of felodipine 5 mg and metoprolol 50 mg produces a significant sustained reduction in systolic and diastolic BP with similar plasma concentration profiles over a 24-h period.
本研究旨在通过动态血压监测,研究非洛地平缓释片(ER)5mg与美托洛尔控释片(CR/ZOC)50mg以固定复方(洛吉美)或自由联合给药方式,用于老年(年龄大于60岁)高血压患者的疗效和耐受性。次要目的是将自由联合和固定复方的疗效与药代动力学特征相关联。
这是一项双盲、安慰剂对照的随机三向交叉多中心研究。在三个治疗阶段的最后一天,使用动态血压监测(ABPM)测量血压26小时。
在ABPM的谷值期测量的平均坐位血压,美托洛尔和非洛地平的自由联合和固定复方均显著低于安慰剂(自由联合141/83mmHg,固定复方140/83mmHg,安慰剂156/93mmHg)。使用ABPM在24小时内测量的平均血压,自由联合、固定复方和安慰剂治疗组分别为143/82mmHg、140/82mmHg和158/93mmHg。自由联合和固定复方的收缩压谷峰比(T:P)分别为75%和79%,舒张压谷峰比分别为70%和70%。药代动力学评估显示,非洛地平以自由联合或固定复方给药时,血浆浓度-时间曲线相同。美托洛尔血浆浓度-时间曲线的比较显示,固定复方制剂的释放速率延迟。在此期间,活性治疗之间的血压控制无显著差异。纳入研究的26例患者中,3例在活性期因非药物相关原因退出。无患者因治疗相关不良事件退出活性治疗。非洛地平与美托洛尔固定复方的不良事件报告频率与安慰剂相似(分别为60%和58%)。
结果表明,每日一次服用非洛地平5mg与美托洛尔50mg的自由联合或固定复方,可使收缩压和舒张压显著持续降低,且在24小时内血浆浓度分布相似。