• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高级创伤与生命支持原则:对其在农村创伤中心应用情况的审核

Advanced trauma and life support principles: an audit of their application in a rural trauma centre.

作者信息

Calleary J G, el-Nazir A K, el-Sadig O, Carolan P E, Joyce W P

机构信息

Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Cavan/Monaghan General Hospital, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 1999 Apr-Jun;168(2):93-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02946472.

DOI:10.1007/BF02946472
PMID:10422385
Abstract

In December of 1995 a system of trauma care based on Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) principles was instituted to assess the impact of such principles on trauma care in a rural general hospital setting. This audit reviews the results over a 2 yr period to December 1997. All patients admitted with major trauma (i.e. with life threatening or potentially life threatening injuries) to Cavan General Hospital (CGH) were eligible for inclusion. This numbered 70 patients admitted (for at least 3 days), or who were transferred after resuscitation and stabilization as well as inpatient deaths. Twenty-seven patients who died prior to admission are also reviewed. The endpoints assessed were death, disability and survival 3 months post-accident. Based on injury severity scores 7 per cent of cases suffered fatal non-survivable injury, 20-30 per cent had very serious injury with an overall mortality rate of 17 per cent. The predicted mortality rate was 30 per cent. One-third had their full treatment at CGH with a 76 per cent survival rate. The other two-thirds were transferred for specialist intervention with an overall survival of 80 per cent, a disability rate of 16 per cent and a mortality rate of 4 per cent. No patient died during transportation.

摘要

1995年12月,一套基于高级创伤生命支持(ATLS)原则的创伤护理系统开始实施,以评估这些原则对农村综合医院创伤护理的影响。本次审计回顾了截至1997年12月的两年期间的结果。所有因重大创伤(即危及生命或可能危及生命的损伤)入住卡万综合医院(CGH)的患者均符合纳入标准。这包括70名入院(至少3天)的患者,或在复苏和稳定后被转运的患者以及住院死亡患者。还对27名入院前死亡的患者进行了审查。评估的终点是事故后3个月的死亡、残疾和存活情况。根据损伤严重程度评分,7%的病例遭受致命的不可存活损伤,20%-30%的病例有非常严重的损伤,总死亡率为17%。预测死亡率为30%。三分之一的患者在CGH接受了全面治疗,存活率为76%。另外三分之二的患者被转运接受专科干预,总存活率为80%,残疾率为16%,死亡率为4%。没有患者在转运过程中死亡。

相似文献

1
Advanced trauma and life support principles: an audit of their application in a rural trauma centre.高级创伤与生命支持原则:对其在农村创伤中心应用情况的审核
Ir J Med Sci. 1999 Apr-Jun;168(2):93-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02946472.
2
Regional audit of pedestrian accident care.行人事故护理的区域审计
Injury. 1993 Aug;24(7):435-7. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(93)90142-s.
3
Non-orthopaedic paediatric trauma in a regional hospital.
Ir J Med Sci. 2005 Oct-Dec;174(4):23-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03168977.
4
Transatlantic perspectives of trauma systems.创伤系统的跨大西洋视角
Br J Surg. 1993 Aug;80(8):985-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800815.
5
Non-accidental Trauma Injury Patterns and Outcomes: A Single Institutional Experience.非意外创伤的损伤模式与结局:单机构经验
Am Surg. 2015 Sep;81(9):835-8.
6
Changing the culture around end-of-life care in the trauma intensive care unit.改变创伤重症监护病房临终关怀的文化氛围。
J Trauma. 2008 Jun;64(6):1587-93. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318174f112.
7
Pediatric Trauma System Evaluation before and after Level II Verification.二级验证前后的儿科创伤系统评估
Am Surg. 2019 Nov 1;85(11):1281-1287.
8
Inclusion of 'minor' trauma cases provides a better estimate of the total burden of injury: Queensland Trauma Registry provides a unique perspective.纳入“轻微”创伤病例能更准确地估计损伤的总体负担:昆士兰创伤登记处提供了独特视角。
Injury. 2014 Aug;45(8):1236-41. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.03.023. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
9
Data capture and communication during transfers to definitive care in an inclusive trauma system.在包容性创伤系统中,向确定性治疗转移过程中的数据采集与通信。
Injury. 2017 May;48(5):1069-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
10
Perineal injuries at a large urban trauma center: injury patterns and outcomes.大型城市创伤中心的会阴损伤:损伤模式与结局
Am Surg. 2009 Apr;75(4):317-20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Advanced Trauma Life Support course: a history of its development and review of related literature.高级创伤生命支持课程:其发展历程及相关文献综述
Postgrad Med J. 2005 Feb;81(952):87-91. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.021543.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of a regional trauma system in reducing mortality from major trauma: before and after study.区域创伤系统在降低严重创伤死亡率方面的有效性:前后对照研究。
BMJ. 1997 Nov 22;315(7119):1349-54. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7119.1349.
2
Role of the general surgeon in a British trauma centre.普通外科医生在英国创伤中心的作用。
Br J Surg. 1996 Sep;83(9):1248-51.
3
Simplifying the assessment of rural emergency medical services trauma transport.简化农村紧急医疗服务创伤转运的评估
Med Care. 1996 Dec;34(12):1180-7. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199612000-00003.
4
An evaluation of Ontario trauma outcomes and the development of regional norms for Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) analysis.安大略省创伤结果评估及创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)分析的区域标准制定。
J Trauma. 1996 Oct;41(4):731-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199610000-00023.
5
An evaluation of patient outcomes before and after trauma center designation using Trauma and Injury Severity Score analysis.使用创伤和损伤严重程度评分分析对创伤中心指定前后的患者预后进行评估。
J Trauma. 1995 Dec;39(6):1036-40. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199512000-00003.
6
The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.损伤严重度评分:一种描述多发伤患者及评估急诊治疗的方法。
J Trauma. 1974 Mar;14(3):187-96.
7
ABC of major trauma. Scoring systems for trauma.重大创伤基础。创伤评分系统。
BMJ. 1990 Nov 10;301(6760):1090-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6760.1090.
8
Multivariate population-based analysis of the association of county trauma centers with per capita county trauma death rates.
J Trauma. 1992 Jul;33(1):29-37; discussion 37-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199207000-00007.
9
Preliminary analysis of the care of injured patients in 33 British hospitals: first report of the United Kingdom major trauma outcome study.英国33家医院创伤患者护理的初步分析:英国重大创伤结局研究的首次报告
BMJ. 1992 Sep 26;305(6856):737-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6856.737.