Bachmann K, Sullivan T J, Reese J H, Jauregui L, Miller K, Scott M, Stotka J, Harris J
Center for Applied Pharmacology, The University of Toledo College of Pharmacy, OH 43606, USA.
Am J Ther. 1997 Feb-Mar;4(2-3):73-9. doi: 10.1097/00045391-199702000-00004.
The effect of a standard regimen of dirithromycin, a macrolide antibiotic, on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of the H (1) receptor blocker astemizole was evaluated in a sample of 18 healthy young adults (nine males and nine females). The study was conducted in a two-way cross-over fashion after the subjects had been randomly given either dirithromycin (two 250 mg tablets) or placebo (two tablets) every morning for 10 days. On the morning of the fourth dose of either dirithromycin or placebo each subject ingested a single 30-mg oral dose (three 10-mg tablets) of astemizole. The disposition kinetics of both astemizole and its major metabolite, N-desmethylastemizole, were characterized after measuring the concentrations of both analytes in the serum fraction of serial blood samples collected for 14 days after the astemizole dose. In addition, corrected QT (QT(c) ) intervals were estimated from electrocardiogram rhythm strips that were run 24 hours prior to the astemizole dose, 12 hours after the astemizole dose, and after the last treatment (dirithromycin or placebo) dose in both study periods. Pharmacokinetic parameters that were measured for both astemizole and N-desmethylastemizole during each treatment were: C(max), t(max), AUC (0-infinity), CL(oral), half-life, and volume of distribution (V). None of the parameters for N-desmethylastemizole was different when comparing data by ANOVA from the dirithromycin treatment period with that of the placebo treatment period. On the other hand, during dirithromycin treatment astemizole CL(oral) was 34% slower, volume of distribution was 24% larger, and half-life was 84% longer. Generally, all QT ( c ) intervals did not appear to be affected by dirithromycin treatment. The changes in astemizole kinetics could not be attributed to its N-demethylation since the dispositional kinetics of N-desmethylastemizole were unaffected by dirithromycin. Therefore, it is difficult to ascertain the clinical significance of the changes in astemizole kinetics. Since there were no significant differences for mean QT(c) intervals and no effect of dirithromycin treatment on N-desmethylastemizole kinetics, it is unlikely that a standard regimen of dirithromycin would place a patient taking astemizole at an increased risk of torsade de pointes or related ventricular arrhythmias.
在18名健康的年轻成年人(9名男性和9名女性)样本中,评估了大环内酯类抗生素地红霉素的标准治疗方案对H(1)受体阻滞剂阿司咪唑单剂量药代动力学的影响。在受试者被随机分配每天早晨服用地红霉素(两片250毫克片剂)或安慰剂(两片),持续10天后,以双向交叉方式进行该研究。在服用地红霉素或安慰剂的第四剂当天早晨,每位受试者口服单剂量30毫克(三片10毫克片剂)的阿司咪唑。在测定阿司咪唑剂量后14天收集的系列血样血清部分中两种分析物的浓度后,对阿司咪唑及其主要代谢物N-去甲基阿司咪唑的处置动力学进行了表征。此外,从阿司咪唑给药前24小时、阿司咪唑给药后12小时以及两个研究期的最后一次治疗(地红霉素或安慰剂)给药后的心电图节律条中估计校正QT(QT(c))间期。在每次治疗期间测量的阿司咪唑和N-去甲基阿司咪唑的药代动力学参数为:C(max)、t(max)、AUC(0-无穷大)、CL(口服)、半衰期和分布容积(V)。通过方差分析比较地红霉素治疗期和安慰剂治疗期的数据时,N-去甲基阿司咪唑的参数没有差异。另一方面,在服用地红霉素期间,阿司咪唑的CL(口服)减慢34%,分布容积增大24%,半衰期延长84%。一般来说,所有QT(c)间期似乎都不受地红霉素治疗的影响。阿司咪唑动力学的变化不能归因于其N-去甲基化,因为N-去甲基阿司咪唑的处置动力学不受地红霉素影响。因此,难以确定阿司咪唑动力学变化的临床意义。由于平均QT(c)间期没有显著差异,且地红霉素治疗对N-去甲基阿司咪唑动力学没有影响,因此地红霉素的标准治疗方案不太可能使服用阿司咪唑的患者发生尖端扭转型室速或相关室性心律失常的风险增加。