Suppr超能文献

使用三种当代牙齿颜色树脂粘结修复材料制作的高嵌体修复牙齿的抗折性。

Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative materials.

作者信息

Brunton P A, Cattell P, Burke F J, Wilson N H

机构信息

Turner Dental School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Aug;82(2):167-71. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70151-4.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

There are uncertainties regarding the use of large indirect composites and ceramics in the restoration of posterior teeth.

PURPOSE

This study investigated the fracture resistance of teeth restored with restorations of 3 contemporary resin-bonded tooth-colored materials placed in a standardized onlay preparation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A random sample of preparations for tooth-colored onlays was obtained from a full service dental laboratory. A preparation was then duplicated in 30 natural teeth by copy milling. An additional 10 teeth were not prepared, and acted as a control. Ten onlays of each of the 3 materials (Belle Glass, SR Isosit, and Empress) were produced and resin bonded into place according to the manufacturers' instructions. The restorations were compressively loaded to fracture and the mode of failure recorded.

RESULTS

The fracture resistances obtained for the teeth restored with the composite material (mean 1.56 kN; SD 0.54) were greater than those obtained for the teeth restored with the ceramic material (mean 0.99 kN; SD 0.49) and the fiber-reinforced composite material (mean 0.99 kN; SD 0.56).

CONCLUSION

Teeth restored with composite onlay restorations demonstrated a higher fracture resistance than equivalent sized onlay restorations produced from fiber-reinforced composite or a ceramic material. Failure under compressive loading may be found to be less catastrophic when a fiber-reinforced composite rather than a composite or ceramic material is used.

摘要

问题陈述

在使用大型间接复合材料和陶瓷修复后牙时存在不确定性。

目的

本研究调查了用三种当代树脂粘结牙齿颜色材料修复的牙齿在标准化高嵌体预备中的抗折性。

材料与方法

从一家提供全方位服务的牙科实验室随机抽取牙齿颜色高嵌体的预备样本。然后通过复制铣削在30颗天然牙上复制一个预备体。另外10颗牙齿未进行预备,作为对照。制作三种材料(贝勒玻璃、SR伊索斯和帝瓷)各自的10个高嵌体,并按照制造商的说明用树脂粘结到位。对修复体进行压缩加载直至断裂,并记录失败模式。

结果

用复合材料修复的牙齿获得的抗折性(平均1.56 kN;标准差0.54)大于用陶瓷材料修复的牙齿(平均0.99 kN;标准差0.49)和纤维增强复合材料修复的牙齿(平均0.99 kN;标准差0.56)。

结论

用复合高嵌体修复的牙齿比用纤维增强复合材料或陶瓷材料制作的同等尺寸高嵌体修复体表现出更高的抗折性。当使用纤维增强复合材料而不是复合材料或陶瓷材料时,压缩加载下的失败可能会发现灾难性较小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验