Suissa S
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Aug 1;150(3):279-82. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009999.
The proverbial relative risk may not always be the most suitable measure to compare the risk of two exposures, since it inherently includes a background effect. An alternative comparative measure, the relative excess risk, is introduced. It applies to situations in which an "unexposed" reference group is included in addition to the two exposures under evaluation. This comparative measure is based solely on the component of risk due to the exposures, since it removes the background risk. Estimators of the relative excess risk are presented, along with formulas for the confidence intervals under cohort and case-control designs, using both crude and adjusted rate ratios. This new measure is illustrated with data from epidemiologic studies of the risks of oral contraceptives and antidiabetic drugs.
众所周知的相对风险可能并不总是比较两种暴露风险的最合适指标,因为它本身包含了一种背景效应。本文引入了一种替代的比较指标——相对超额风险。它适用于除了所评估的两种暴露之外还包括一个“未暴露”参照组的情况。这种比较指标仅基于暴露所致的风险成分,因为它去除了背景风险。本文给出了相对超额风险的估计方法,以及队列研究和病例对照研究设计下使用粗率比和调整率比的置信区间公式。通过口服避孕药和抗糖尿病药物风险的流行病学研究数据对这一新指标进行了说明。