Gonzalez R P, Falimirski M E
Department of Surgery, Christ Hospital and Medical Center, Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA.
Am Surg. 1999 Aug;65(8):711-3; discussion 714.
Our objective was to evaluate whether physical examination in conjunction with chest X-ray can accurately diagnose the presence of significant vascular injury in penetrating periclavicular trauma. Results from a management protocol for penetrating periclavicular trauma were reviewed for the period January 1992 through December 1996 at an urban Level I trauma center. All patients requiring angiography for periclavicular penetrating trauma with trajectory of the injury falling between the lateral border of the manubrium and the anterior axillary line were entered into the management protocol. All patients underwent anterior-posterior chest radiography on arrival to the trauma center and 6 hours after admission. Tube thoracostomy was placed if clinically indicated on presentation or for X-ray findings. Clinical assessment was performed on all patients, with emphasis placed on the presence of "hard" signs for vascular injury. In addition to accepted hard signs for vascular injury, significant chest tube output (>1000 cc) and chest X-ray findings consistent with significant hemorrhage were also considered hard signs for vascular injury. Assuming hemodynamic stability, all patients with suspected subclavian/axillary arterial injury based on wound trajectory or clinical findings consistent with vascular injury underwent angiography. Forty-six patients were entered into the protocol with 30 left-sided injuries and 16 right sided injuries. The majority of injuries were secondary to gunshot wounds (31), with 14 stab wounds and 1 shotgun injury. Emergency room chest X-ray results revealed 32 negative chest X-rays, 7 pneumothoraces, 2 hemopneumothoraces, 2 hemothoraces, and 3 chest tubes placed before initial chest X-ray. A total of 7 injuries were diagnosed, with 1 missed injury, resulting in a sensitivity of 86 per cent for clinical assessment. The missed injury was a pseudoaneurysm of an axillary artery secondary to a self-inflicted shotgun wound. One mortality occurred in this series, which was a death in the operating room secondary to blood loss from an axillary artery injury. We conclude that clinical assessment can adequately diagnose the presence of surgically significant vascular injury in periclavicular penetrating injuries with trajectories lateral to the manubrium.
我们的目的是评估体格检查结合胸部X线检查能否准确诊断锁骨周围穿透伤中严重血管损伤的存在。回顾了1992年1月至1996年12月期间在一家城市一级创伤中心实施的锁骨周围穿透伤管理方案的结果。所有因锁骨周围穿透伤且损伤轨迹位于胸骨柄外侧缘与腋前线之间而需要进行血管造影的患者均纳入该管理方案。所有患者在抵达创伤中心时及入院6小时后均接受前后位胸部X线检查。如果根据临床表现或X线检查结果有临床指征,则进行胸腔闭式引流术。对所有患者进行临床评估,重点关注血管损伤的“硬”体征。除了公认的血管损伤硬体征外,大量胸腔闭式引流液(>1000 cc)以及与大量出血相符的胸部X线表现也被视为血管损伤的硬体征。假设血流动力学稳定,所有根据伤口轨迹或与血管损伤相符的临床表现怀疑有锁骨下/腋动脉损伤的患者均接受血管造影。46例患者纳入该方案,其中左侧损伤30例,右侧损伤16例。大多数损伤继发于枪伤(31例),14例为刺伤,1例为猎枪伤。急诊室胸部X线检查结果显示,32例胸部X线检查阴性,7例气胸,2例血气胸,2例血胸,3例在首次胸部X线检查前已放置胸腔闭式引流管。共诊断出7例损伤,1例漏诊,临床评估的敏感性为86%。漏诊的损伤是一例继发于自伤猎枪伤的腋动脉假性动脉瘤。该系列中有1例死亡,是在手术室因腋动脉损伤失血死亡。我们得出结论,对于胸骨外侧轨迹的锁骨周围穿透伤,临床评估能够充分诊断出具有手术意义的血管损伤的存在。