Ciresi D L, Cali R F, Senagore A J
Division of Trauma, Spectrum Health Downtown Campus, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
Am Surg. 1999 Aug;65(8):720-4; discussion 724-5.
Patients who receive high-volume resuscitation after massive abdominopelvic trauma, or emergent repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA), are at a significant risk for postoperative abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Absorbable prosthetic closure of the abdominal wall has been recommended as a means of managing ACS. However, use of absorbable prosthetic has been associated with very high rates of intestinal fistula formation and ventral hernia formation. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review our experience with the use of nonabsorbable prosthetic abdominal closures in patients with documented ACS or at high risk for ACS. All patients managed by this technique from July 1995 through July 1997 after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm or massive abdominopelvic trauma were evaluated. A total of 18 patients were identified: 15 primary prosthetic placements (Gore-Tex patch, 12; Marlex mesh, 2; and silastic mesh, 1) and 3 delayed prosthetic placements for ACS (Gore-Tex, 1 and Marlex, 2). The mortality rate was 22 percent (4 of 18) and resulted from multisystem organ failure (2 patients), cardiac arrest 1 hour postoperatively (1 patient), and severe closed head injury (1 patient). Secondary closure and prosthetic removal was possible in 16 of 18 patients, including the 2 patients who died of multisystem organ failure within the same hospitalization. Delayed abdominal closure at a subsequent admission was performed in two cases. This same patient developed an enterocutaneous fistula 2 months after discharge. Importantly, only 1 of 18 closed in this manner developed ACS requiring reoperation. The results indicate that use of a nonabsorbable prosthetic, particularly with Gore-Tex, is efficacious in the prevention of postoperative ACS in high-risk patients, while it enhances the possibility for delayed abdominal closure and minimizes the risk of gastrointestinal fistulization associated with other techniques.
在遭受大面积腹部盆腔创伤或接受腹主动脉瘤破裂(RAAA)紧急修复术后接受大量液体复苏的患者,术后发生腹腔间隔室综合征(ACS)的风险很高。推荐使用可吸收人工材料关闭腹壁作为治疗ACS的一种方法。然而,使用可吸收人工材料与肠瘘形成和腹侧疝形成的发生率非常高有关。本研究的目的是回顾性分析我们在有记录的ACS患者或ACS高危患者中使用不可吸收人工材料关闭腹壁的经验。对1995年7月至1997年7月间因腹主动脉瘤破裂或大面积腹部盆腔创伤修复后采用该技术治疗的所有患者进行了评估。共确定了18例患者:15例初次放置人工材料(戈尔特斯补片,12例;Marlex网片,2例;硅橡胶网片,1例),3例因ACS延迟放置人工材料(戈尔特斯,1例;Marlex,2例)。死亡率为22%(18例中的4例),死亡原因包括多系统器官衰竭(2例)、术后1小时心脏骤停(1例)和严重闭合性颅脑损伤(1例)。18例患者中有16例可行二期缝合和取出人工材料,包括在同一住院期间死于多系统器官衰竭的2例患者。2例患者在随后的入院时进行了延迟腹壁关闭。同一患者出院后2个月发生肠皮肤瘘。重要的是,以这种方式关闭的18例患者中只有1例发生了需要再次手术的ACS。结果表明,使用不可吸收人工材料,特别是戈尔特斯,在预防高危患者术后ACS方面是有效的,同时增加了延迟腹壁关闭的可能性,并将与其他技术相关的胃肠道瘘形成风险降至最低。