Tordiglione M, Luraghi R, Antognoni P
Divisione di Radioterapia, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese.
Radiol Med. 1999 May;97(5):372-7.
The presence of bone metastases is a common event in the natural history of nearly all neoplasms which often affects the patient's quality of life greatly. Bone metastases may cause pain and pathologic fractures, or even a cord compression syndrome with severe neurologic symptoms. We tried to assess the optimal irradiation schedule for these patients and to discuss the use of radiopharmaceuticals.
We reviewed the literature focusing on studies investigating the efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy for bone metastases. We also addressed the problem of treating multiple skeletal lesions with half-body irradiation and radionuclides.
External beam irradiation achieves pain palliation in more than 75% of patients with bone metastases, even with hypofractionation down to a single-dose administration. The results of exclusive radiotherapy in the cord compression syndrome depend on a prompt diagnosis, patient presentation and the intrinsic radiosensitivity of tumor cells. Palsy can always be avoided in these patients. Half-body irradiation can achieve complete pain relief in over 20% of patients and decrease pain markedly in the remaining cases with only a single-dose fraction (6-10 Gy), within 48 hours of irradiation and with little side-effects. Better results in terms of pain relief (80% complete responses) and duration of palliation come from fractionated half-body irradiation (up to 17.5 Gy in 7 fractions), which however has a more delayed response (1-2 weeks) and higher toxicity. The use of radiopharmaceuticals has been recently reevaluated after the introduction of new nuclides: results are similar to those of external beam irradiation (up to 80% responses), but cost and hematologic toxicity are both high. Radiopharmaceuticals can be used within an integrated treatment with external beam irradiation, chemotherapy and biphosphonates.
The efficacy of external beam irradiation in the palliation of bone metastasis-related symptoms is confirmed by this literature review, even with short treatments and single-dose administrations. This is important for both patient expectations and the necessity for improved resource allocation with reference to the territorial distribution and waiting lists of radiotherapy centers. Finally, as for the role of radiopharmaceuticals, the best nuclides are not widely used yet for the high cost of the treatment, even though they provide similar results to external beam irradiation. The issue of their efficacy in combination with antiblastic drugs and/or external beam irradiation remains open and will be clarified only with further randomized clinical trials.
骨转移在几乎所有肿瘤的自然病程中都很常见,常常极大地影响患者的生活质量。骨转移可能导致疼痛和病理性骨折,甚至引发伴有严重神经症状的脊髓压迫综合征。我们试图评估针对这些患者的最佳放疗方案,并探讨放射性药物的使用。
我们回顾了聚焦于研究低分割放疗对骨转移疗效的文献。我们还探讨了用半身照射和放射性核素治疗多处骨骼病变的问题。
外照射能使超过75%的骨转移患者的疼痛得到缓解,即使是低分割至单次剂量给药。脊髓压迫综合征单纯放疗的结果取决于及时诊断、患者表现以及肿瘤细胞的固有放射敏感性。这些患者总能避免瘫痪。半身照射能使超过20%的患者疼痛完全缓解,其余患者在照射后48小时内仅单次分割剂量(6 - 10 Gy)就能显著减轻疼痛,且副作用小。分次半身照射(7次分割达17.5 Gy)在疼痛缓解(80%完全缓解)和缓解持续时间方面效果更好,但反应延迟(1 - 2周)且毒性更高。引入新的核素后,放射性药物的使用最近得到了重新评估:结果与外照射相似(高达80%的缓解率),但成本和血液学毒性都很高。放射性药物可用于与外照射、化疗和双膦酸盐的综合治疗中。
这篇文献综述证实了外照射在缓解骨转移相关症状方面的疗效,即使是短疗程和单次剂量给药。这对于患者的期望以及改善资源分配的必要性都很重要,涉及放疗中心的地域分布和等候名单。最后,至于放射性药物的作用,尽管它们与外照射效果相似,但由于治疗成本高,最佳核素尚未得到广泛应用。它们与抗骨吸收药物和/或外照射联合使用的疗效问题仍未解决,只有通过进一步的随机临床试验才能阐明。