Glaus A, Crow R, Hammond S
Zentrum für Tumordiagnostik und Prävention, St. Gallen.
Pflege. 1999 Apr;12(2):75-81. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302.12.2.75.
A qualitative study to explore the concept of fatigue/tiredness in cancer patients and in healthy individuals Interest in fatigue-research has grown since the finding that fatigue/tiredness is the most frequently reported symptom of cancer and its treatment. But even though several authors have tried to conceptualise fatigue its mechanisms are still poorly understood. The aim of this study was twofold: 1. to explore fatigue in cancer patients, inductively, and 2. to compare experiences of fatigue/tiredness of healthy individuals with that of cancer patients to identify cancer-specific fatigue/tiredness and related concepts. A qualitative research strategy was adopted using a grounded theory approach. The prospective study took place in the Oncology Department of the Kantonsspital St. Gallen (Switzerland) with samples of 20 cancer patients and 20 healthy individuals. Unstructured, tape recorded interviews were conducted to collect data. The transcripts of the interviews were analysed using content analysis and constant comparison. Different themes emerged between the two groups although both fitted a classification system, which categorised fatigue into physical, affective and cognitive expressions of fatigue/tiredness. Physical signs were more frequent than affective and cognitive signs in both groups. In the cancer patients, fatigue involved decreased physical performance, extreme, unusual tiredness, weakness and unusual need for rest, which was distinctly different for healthy persons. Affective and cognitive distress was also more prominent in cancer patients. Interestingly, the concept of malaise was not identified by either sample and not understood as an expression of fatigue by this German speaking population. Linguistic differences in the description of fatigue/tiredness between healthy and ill individuals revealed different perceptions of the phenomenon. A step-like theory, explaining the production of fatigue/tiredness was tentatively put forward involving nociception, perception and expression of tiredness. The emerging concepts break tiredness/fatigue into expression of physical, affective and cognitive tiredness/fatigue. The experience is different between healthy individuals and cancer patients. Generalisability of data needs precaution but the results of the study identifies and clarifies ideas that might form an important basis for further, controlled studies.
一项探索癌症患者及健康个体疲劳/疲倦概念的定性研究 自从发现疲劳/疲倦是癌症及其治疗中最常报告的症状以来,对疲劳研究的兴趣与日俱增。尽管有几位作者试图对疲劳进行概念化,但对其机制仍知之甚少。本研究的目的有两个:1. 归纳性地探索癌症患者的疲劳;2. 比较健康个体与癌症患者的疲劳/疲倦体验,以识别癌症特异性疲劳/疲倦及相关概念。采用扎根理论方法的定性研究策略。前瞻性研究在瑞士圣加仑州立医院肿瘤科进行,样本包括20名癌症患者和20名健康个体。通过进行无结构的录音访谈来收集数据。访谈记录采用内容分析和持续比较的方法进行分析。两组之间出现了不同的主题,尽管两者都符合一个分类系统,该系统将疲劳分为疲劳/疲倦的身体、情感和认知表现。两组中身体症状比情感和认知症状更常见。在癌症患者中,疲劳包括身体机能下降、极度、异常疲倦、虚弱和异常的休息需求,这与健康人明显不同。情感和认知困扰在癌症患者中也更为突出。有趣的是,两组样本均未识别出不适的概念,并且讲德语的人群也不将其理解为疲劳的一种表现。健康个体和患病个体在描述疲劳/疲倦时的语言差异揭示了对该现象的不同认知。初步提出了一个阶梯状理论来解释疲劳/疲倦的产生,该理论涉及伤害感受、疲劳的感知和表达。新出现的概念将疲倦/疲劳分解为身体、情感和认知疲倦/疲劳的表现。健康个体和癌症患者的体验不同。数据的可推广性需要谨慎对待,但该研究结果识别并阐明了一些观点,这些观点可能为进一步的对照研究奠定重要基础。