Gledhill Jane
Institut Gustave Roussy, 39, rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2005 Dec;9(4):294-312; discussion 313-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2004.11.002. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
The aim of this study was to explore the differences in the representation of fatigue between cancer patients and healthy subjects; identify the concepts, dimensions and terminology of fatigue specific to patients with cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and healthy persons; examine some of the strategies used in illness and in health to overcome fatigue. A qualitative research design, using grounded theory was used. Twenty-four cancer patients were recruited in outpatients or the wards of a cancer institute and 24 healthy subjects among the hospital personnel or the investigator's entourage. Data were collected through individual audio-taped, open-ended interviews. The transcripts of the interviews were reviewed, and the participants' responses analysed thematically and grouped into major categories and sub-categories. This study demonstrated differences in the intensity, variability, duration and temporality of fatigue between patients and healthy subjects. Analysis resulted in the categorisation of fatigue into three major dimensions, physical, affective and cognitive, common to both patients and healthy subjects, although the frequency and occurrence of themes within these categories differed slightly in the two groups. A fourth category, distress, was identified in the patient group. The linguistic descriptions of fatigue confirmed the differing perceptions of fatigue between patients and healthy individuals and a heightened concern for the negative aspects of fatigue and suffering among patients. A four-step conceptual model for fatigue was developed explaining the different stages in individual responses to fatigue.
本研究的目的是探讨癌症患者与健康受试者在疲劳表现上的差异;确定与癌症相关疲劳(CRF)患者及健康人特有的疲劳概念、维度和术语;研究在患病和健康状态下用于克服疲劳的一些策略。采用了基于扎根理论的定性研究设计。在一家癌症研究所的门诊或病房招募了24名癌症患者,并在医院工作人员或研究者的随行人员中招募了24名健康受试者。通过个人录音的开放式访谈收集数据。对访谈记录进行了审查,并对参与者的回答进行了主题分析,归纳为主要类别和子类别。本研究表明,患者与健康受试者在疲劳的强度、变异性、持续时间和时间性方面存在差异。分析结果将疲劳分为三个主要维度,即身体、情感和认知维度,这两个群体在这些类别中的主题频率和出现情况略有不同。在患者组中还确定了第四个类别,即痛苦。对疲劳的语言描述证实了患者与健康个体对疲劳的不同认知,以及患者对疲劳负面影响和痛苦的更高关注。开发了一个疲劳的四步概念模型,解释个体对疲劳反应的不同阶段。