• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美罗培南与头孢噻肟治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎疗效和安全性的前瞻性、随机、研究者设盲研究。美罗培南脑膜炎研究组。

Prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded study of the efficacy and safety of meropenem vs. cefotaxime therapy in bacterial meningitis in children. Meropenem Meningitis Study Group.

作者信息

Odio C M, Puig J R, Feris J M, Khan W N, Rodriguez W J, McCracken G H, Bradley J S

机构信息

Children's Hospital and Health Science Center, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Centro América, San José, Costa Rica.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999 Jul;18(7):581-90. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199907000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00006454-199907000-00004
PMID:10440432
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of meropenem with cefotaxime for the treatment of infants and children with bacterial meningitis.

METHODS

Infants and children with strongly suspected or documented bacterial meningitis were randomly assigned in a prospective multicenter study to receive either meropenem or cefotaxime. Patients were assessed at the end of therapy and at 5 to 7 weeks and 5 to 7 months after the end of treatment for the presence of neurologic and sensory neural sequelae.

RESULTS

A total of 258 children were randomized to either treatment group. A further 8 patients with suspected pneumococcal meningitis were treated with meropenem without randomization. Of the randomized patients 154 were fully evaluable, 79 in the meropenem group and 75 in the cefotaxime group. At the end of treatment there were no significant differences in clinical outcome between the two treatment groups. Clinical cure with or without sequelae was achieved in 97 and 96% of the meropenem- and cefotaxime-treated patients, respectively. At the end of treatment and at 5 to 7 weeks, 46 and 54% of meropenem patients were cured with no sequelae, respectively. Corresponding results for cefotaxime patients were 56 and 58%. All pathogens were eradicated. In total 37 patients had seizures during treatment, 15 (12%) in the meropenem and 22 (17%) in the cefotaxime group. None of the seizures was considered to be drug-related.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial shows that meropenem is suitable therapy for bacterial meningitis in infants and children and that it offers an efficacy and safety profile similar to that of cefotaxime.

摘要

目的

比较美罗培南与头孢噻肟治疗婴幼儿细菌性脑膜炎的疗效和安全性。

方法

在一项前瞻性多中心研究中,将高度怀疑或确诊为细菌性脑膜炎的婴幼儿随机分组,分别接受美罗培南或头孢噻肟治疗。在治疗结束时、治疗结束后5至7周以及5至7个月时,对患者进行评估,以确定是否存在神经和感觉神经后遗症。

结果

共有258名儿童被随机分配至任一治疗组。另有8名疑似肺炎球菌脑膜炎的患者未参与随机分组,接受了美罗培南治疗。在随机分组的患者中,154名可进行全面评估,美罗培南组79名,头孢噻肟组75名。治疗结束时,两个治疗组的临床结局无显著差异。美罗培南组和头孢噻肟组临床治愈(无论有无后遗症)的患者分别为97%和96%。治疗结束时以及5至7周时,美罗培南组分别有46%和54%的患者治愈且无后遗症。头孢噻肟组的相应结果分别为56%和58%。所有病原体均被清除。治疗期间共有37名患者发生癫痫,美罗培南组15名(12%),头孢噻肟组22名(17%)。所有癫痫发作均不被认为与药物相关。

结论

本试验表明,美罗培南是治疗婴幼儿细菌性脑膜炎的合适药物,其疗效和安全性与头孢噻肟相似。

相似文献

1
Prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded study of the efficacy and safety of meropenem vs. cefotaxime therapy in bacterial meningitis in children. Meropenem Meningitis Study Group.美罗培南与头孢噻肟治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎疗效和安全性的前瞻性、随机、研究者设盲研究。美罗培南脑膜炎研究组。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999 Jul;18(7):581-90. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199907000-00004.
2
Randomized comparison of meropenem with cefotaxime for treatment of bacterial meningitis. Meropenem Meningitis Study Group.美罗培南与头孢噻肟治疗细菌性脑膜炎的随机对照研究。美罗培南脑膜炎研究组。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 May;39(5):1140-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.5.1140.
3
A randomised comparison of meropenem with cefotaxime or ceftriaxone for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in adults. Meropenem Meningitis Study Group.美罗培南与头孢噻肟或头孢曲松治疗成人细菌性脑膜炎的随机对照研究。美罗培南脑膜炎研究组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:85-97. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.85.
4
Prospective randomized comparison of cefepime and cefotaxime for treatment of bacterial meningitis in infants and children.头孢吡肟与头孢噻肟治疗婴幼儿细菌性脑膜炎的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Apr;39(4):937-40. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.4.937.
5
Prospective comparison of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime for the short-term treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与头孢噻肟用于儿童细菌性脑膜炎短期治疗的前瞻性比较
Chemotherapy. 1998 Mar-Apr;44(2):142-7. doi: 10.1159/000007106.
6
Pharmacodynamic evaluation of meropenem and cefotaxime for pediatric meningitis: a report from the OPTAMA program.美罗培南和头孢噻肟用于儿童脑膜炎的药效学评价:OPTAMA项目报告
Paediatr Drugs. 2006;8(2):131-8. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200608020-00005.
7
Carbapenem treatment of meningitis.碳青霉烯类药物治疗脑膜炎
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995;96:45-8.
8
A multi-centre study to compare meropenem and cefotaxime and metronidazole in the treatment of hospitalized patients with serious infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 May;39(5):631-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/39.5.631.
9
Cefepime in the empiric treatment of meningitis in children.头孢吡肟用于儿童脑膜炎的经验性治疗。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001 Mar;20(3):356-61. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200103000-00035.
10
Carbapenems in serious infections: a risk-benefit assessment.碳青霉烯类药物用于严重感染:风险效益评估
Drug Saf. 2000 Mar;22(3):191-4. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200022030-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges in the Management of Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in Patients With Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt.脑室腹腔分流术患者革兰氏阴性菌感染的管理挑战
Cureus. 2021 Aug 9;13(8):e17035. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17035. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Meropenem versus Cefotaxime and Ampicillin as Empirical Antibiotic Treatment in Adult Bacterial Meningitis: a Quality Registry Study, 2008 to 2016.美罗培南与头孢噻肟和氨苄西林治疗成人细菌性脑膜炎的经验性抗生素治疗:2008 年至 2016 年的质量登记研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Oct 22;63(11). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00883-19. Print 2019 Nov.
3
Dosing antibiotics in neonates: review of the pharmacokinetic data.
新生儿抗生素给药:药代动力学数据综述
Future Microbiol. 2017 Sep;12(11):1001-1016. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2017-0058. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
4
Adverse events associated with meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin therapy in a large retrospective cohort of hospitalized infants.在一项大型回顾性住院婴儿队列研究中,美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗相关的不良事件。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013 Jul;32(7):748-53. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31828be70b.
5
Pharmacokinetics of antibacterial agents in the CSF of children and adolescents.抗菌药物在儿童和青少年脑脊液中的药代动力学。
Paediatr Drugs. 2013 Apr;15(2):93-117. doi: 10.1007/s40272-013-0017-5.
6
Safety and effectiveness of meropenem in infants with suspected or complicated intra-abdominal infections.美罗培南治疗疑似或复杂腹腔内感染婴儿的安全性和有效性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;55(11):1495-502. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis758. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
7
Acute bacterial meningitis in infants and children: epidemiology and management.婴幼儿急性细菌性脑膜炎:流行病学与治疗。
Paediatr Drugs. 2011 Dec 1;13(6):385-400. doi: 10.2165/11593340-000000000-00000.
8
Treatment of Drug-resistant Pneumococcal Meningitis.耐药性肺炎球菌性脑膜炎的治疗。
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2010 Jul;12(4):274-81. doi: 10.1007/s11908-010-0110-7.
9
Bacterial meningitis: epidemiology, pathogenesis and management update.细菌性脑膜炎:流行病学、发病机制和治疗进展更新。
Drugs. 2009;69(18):2577-96. doi: 10.2165/11530590-000000000-00000.
10
Evaluation of meropenem alone and combined with rifampin in the guinea pig model of pneumococcal meningitis.美罗培南单独及联合利福平在肺炎球菌性脑膜炎豚鼠模型中的评价。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Jul;28(7):807-11. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0711-y. Epub 2009 Feb 17.